IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v118y2023i3d10.1007_s11069-023-06060-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prediction of embankments dam break peak outflow: a comparison between empirical equations and ensemble-based machine learning algorithms

Author

Listed:
  • Khabat Khosravi

    (Florida International University)

  • Zohreh Sheikh Khozani

    (Alfred Wegener Institute, Helmholtz Center for Polar and Marine Research)

  • Javad Hatamiafkoueieh

    (Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia, RUDN University))

Abstract

To accurately predict dam break peak outflow (Qp), two standalone [random tree (RT), instance-based k-nearest neighbors learning (IBK)] and four new ensemble machine learning algorithms, that couple the standalone models with two ensemble methods [bootstrap aggregating (BA), disjoint aggregating (DA)], are proposed. The machine learning methods (RT, IBK, BA-RT, BA-IBK, DA-RT, and DA-IBK) and several popular empirical equations are applied to predict Qp using dam reservoir volume above the breach invert (Vw) and height of water in the dam reservoir above the breach invert (Hw) collected from 122 historical dam break events. Three different input scenarios (Vw, Hw, Vw and Hw) are considered to find the most effective combination of input variables. The proposed models are evaluated visually (using scatter and violin plots as well as Taylor diagrams) and quantitatively (using Nash–Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE), Willmott’s index of agreement (WI), and Legates and McCabe coefficient of efficiency (LM) metrics). It is found that DA-IBK provides the best performance (NSE = 0.866, WI = 0.960 and LM = 0.687), leading to a ~ 28% improvement in NSE compared to the best empirical equation. However, all machine learning models (particularly, the ensemble models), provide substantially better performance than the empirical equations, especially at the highest outflows.

Suggested Citation

  • Khabat Khosravi & Zohreh Sheikh Khozani & Javad Hatamiafkoueieh, 2023. "Prediction of embankments dam break peak outflow: a comparison between empirical equations and ensemble-based machine learning algorithms," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 118(3), pages 1989-2018, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:118:y:2023:i:3:d:10.1007_s11069-023-06060-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-023-06060-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-023-06060-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-023-06060-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hai Tao & Behrooz Keshtegar & Zaher Mundher Yaseen, 2019. "The Feasibility of Integrative Radial Basis M5Tree Predictive Model for River Suspended Sediment Load Simulation," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 33(13), pages 4471-4490, October.
    2. Francesco Serinaldi & Florian Loecker & Chris G. Kilsby & Hubert Bast, 2018. "Flood propagation and duration in large river basins: a data-driven analysis for reinsurance purposes," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 94(1), pages 71-92, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bibhuti Bhusan Sahoo & Sovan Sankalp & Ozgur Kisi, 2023. "A Novel Smoothing-Based Deep Learning Time-Series Approach for Daily Suspended Sediment Load Prediction," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 37(11), pages 4271-4292, September.
    2. Jonah S. McLeod & James Wood & Sinéad J. Lyster & Jeffery M. Valenza & Alan R. T. Spencer & Alexander C. Whittaker, 2023. "Quantitative constraints on flood variability in the rock record," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, December.
    3. Hossein Bonakdari & Andrew D. Binns & Bahram Gharabaghi, 2020. "A Comparative Study of Linear Stochastic with Nonlinear Daily River Discharge Forecast Models," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 34(11), pages 3689-3708, September.
    4. Elham Ghanbari-Adivi & Mohammad Ehteram & Alireza Farrokhi & Zohreh Sheikh Khozani, 2022. "Combining Radial Basis Function Neural Network Models and Inclusive Multiple Models for Predicting Suspended Sediment Loads," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 36(11), pages 4313-4342, September.
    5. Linda Mhalla & Valérie Chavez‐Demoulin & Debbie J. Dupuis, 2020. "Causal mechanism of extreme river discharges in the upper Danube basin network," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 69(4), pages 741-764, August.
    6. Khabat Khosravi & Ali Golkarian & John P. Tiefenbacher, 2022. "Using Optimized Deep Learning to Predict Daily Streamflow: A Comparison to Common Machine Learning Algorithms," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 36(2), pages 699-716, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:118:y:2023:i:3:d:10.1007_s11069-023-06060-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.