IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v114y2022i2d10.1007_s11069-022-05422-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evolution mechanism and deformation stability analysis of rock slope block toppling for early warnings

Author

Listed:
  • Jian-qiao Mu

    (Sichuan Expressway Construction & Development Group Co., Ltd
    Chengdu University of Technology)

  • Tian-tao Li

    (Chengdu University of Technology)

  • Xiang-jun Pei

    (Chengdu University of Technology)

  • Run-qiu Huang

    (Chengdu University of Technology)

  • Fu-an Lan

    (Sichuan Lexi Expressway Co., Ltd)

  • Xue-qing Zou

    (Chengdu Center of Hydrogeology and Engineering Geology Sichuan Bureau of Geology and Mineral Exploration and Development)

Abstract

For massive engineering projects in high and steep mountain areas, toppling deformation, which is an important geological engineering problem in construction, has been observed. Three key issues in the early warning of toppling slopes are the boundary conditions, the evolution mechanism, and deformation stability analysis. This paper investigates an evolution mechanism for the timely prediction of block toppling-induced slope failure in rock masses and examines the relationship between boundary formation and the progressive development of toppling fracture planes. By describing an instantaneous toppling velocity field and identifying two possible fracture plane geometries (linear and parabolic), the optimal path of the toppling fracture plane is searched based on calculations of the critical toppling height (i.e., minimum load) and the upper bound theory of limit analysis. Regardless of the slope structures and mechanical parameters, the optimal path of the toppling fracture plane is straight and most likely oriented perpendicular to the bedding planes. Therefore, considering that structural damage will enable progressive toppling deformation instead of systemic failure, the evolution of block toppling deformation likely replaces the loop following the formation of the first fracture plane because the slope critical height is exceeded. In the loop, the deformation and inclination of columns is updated due to the formation and inclination of fracture planes, which may be perpendicular to the columns. This progressive formation of more inclined fracture planes leads to sliding collapse. The block toppling evolution is divided into 5 stages, and the instability criterion for the transformation of toppling deformation into sliding collapse is defined as the inclination of the fracture plane being equal to its friction angle. In addition, a PFC2D simulation of the entire slope toppling process is performed to verify this speculative evolution mechanism, and a satisfactory result is acquired. Finally, a deformation calculation model of slope block toppling is proposed for stability analysis in accordance with the instability criterion, which is further applied in a typical toppling case. The findings of this study provide a foundation for the deformation, stability and early-warning analysis of block toppling slopes.

Suggested Citation

  • Jian-qiao Mu & Tian-tao Li & Xiang-jun Pei & Run-qiu Huang & Fu-an Lan & Xue-qing Zou, 2022. "Evolution mechanism and deformation stability analysis of rock slope block toppling for early warnings," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 114(2), pages 1171-1195, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:114:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s11069-022-05422-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-022-05422-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-022-05422-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-022-05422-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:114:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s11069-022-05422-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.