IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/metcap/v25y2023i2d10.1007_s11009-023-10030-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Simultaneous Confidence Regions and Weighted Hypotheses on Parameter Arrays

Author

Listed:
  • Yehan Ma

    (Bowling Green State University)

  • Arthur B. Yeh

    (Bowling Green State University)

  • John T. Chen

    (Bowling Green State University)

Abstract

Testing weighted hypotheses simultaneously for a parameter vector has been actively studied in the literature, where the weights encompass information on the importance of the parameters. However, in recent applications of big data analytics for multiple testing on n hypotheses, we are often confronted with the problem of simultaneous inference on a parameter matrix, not a parameter vector. For instance, in the evaluation of overall system reliability, when each subsystem contains k multiple components, the control of global confidence level for the evaluation on system reliability necessitates simultaneous inference on all related parameters in the array of a $$k\times n$$ k × n matrix, where weights are assigned on the basis of the subsystem workloads. So far as we know, there is no publication addressing weighted confidence sets for a parameter matrix. In this paper, we propose a confidence algorithm that generates confidence regions for simultaneous estimation on the parameter array. The new method utilizes a random partition in conjunction with weight assignments to justify for multiplicity. After theoretical derivations, we present simulation studies that cast new lights on intrinsic relationships among coverage probabilities, power performance, and hypothesis weights for multivariate simultaneous confidence sets. For illustration purposes, the new method is applied to analyze factors impacting the taste of red and white wine in a recent study.

Suggested Citation

  • Yehan Ma & Arthur B. Yeh & John T. Chen, 2023. "Simultaneous Confidence Regions and Weighted Hypotheses on Parameter Arrays," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 1-18, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:metcap:v:25:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1007_s11009-023-10030-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s11009-023-10030-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11009-023-10030-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11009-023-10030-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Oda, Ryoya & Suzuki, Yuya & Yanagihara, Hirokazu & Fujikoshi, Yasunori, 2020. "A consistent variable selection method in high-dimensional canonical discriminant analysis," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    2. Lu Wang & Andrea Rotnitzky & Xihong Lin & Randall E. Millikan & Peter F. Thall, 2012. "Evaluation of Viable Dynamic Treatment Regimes in a Sequentially Randomized Trial of Advanced Prostate Cancer," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 107(498), pages 493-508, June.
    3. Yang Yu & John T. Chen & Arthur B. Yeh, 2022. "Weighted step-down confidence procedures with applications to gene expression data," Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(8), pages 2343-2356, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aleksey I. Shinkevich & Alsu R. Akhmetshina & Ruslan R. Khalilov, 2022. "Development of a Methodology for Forecasting the Sustainable Development of Industry in Russia Based on the Tools of Factor and Discriminant Analysis," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-16, March.
    2. Thomas A. Murray & Peter F. Thall & Ying Yuan & Sarah McAvoy & Daniel R. Gomez, 2017. "Robust Treatment Comparison Based on Utilities of Semi-Competing Risks in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 112(517), pages 11-23, January.
    3. Xinru WANG & Nina DELIU & NARITA Yusuke & Bibhas CHAKRABORTY, 2023. "SMART-EXAM: Incorporating Participants' Welfare into Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trials," Discussion papers 23081, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    4. Jincheng Shen & Lu Wang & Jeremy M. G. Taylor, 2017. "Estimation of the optimal regime in treatment of prostate cancer recurrence from observational data using flexible weighting models," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 73(2), pages 635-645, June.
    5. Yasunori Fujikoshi & Tetsuro Sakurai, 2023. "High-Dimensional Consistencies of KOO Methods for the Selection of Variables in Multivariate Linear Regression Models with Covariance Structures," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-15, January.
    6. Markus Frölich & Martin Huber, 2014. "Treatment Evaluation With Multiple Outcome Periods Under Endogeneity and Attrition," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 109(508), pages 1697-1711, December.
    7. Chaffee Paul H. & van der Laan Mark J., 2012. "Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Dynamic Treatment Regimes in Sequentially Randomized Controlled Trials," The International Journal of Biostatistics, De Gruyter, vol. 8(1), pages 1-32, June.
    8. Fujikoshi, Yasunori, 2022. "High-dimensional consistencies of KOO methods in multivariate regression model and discriminant analysis," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    9. Michael P. Wallace & Erica E. M. Moodie, 2015. "Doubly‐robust dynamic treatment regimen estimation via weighted least squares," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 71(3), pages 636-644, September.
    10. Cole Manschot & Eric Laber & Marie Davidian, 2023. "Interim monitoring of sequential multiple assignment randomized trials using partial information," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(4), pages 2881-2894, December.
    11. Armando Turchetta & Erica E. M. Moodie & David A. Stephens & Sylvie D. Lambert, 2023. "Bayesian sample size calculations for comparing two strategies in SMART studies," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(3), pages 2489-2502, September.
    12. Yebin Tao & Lu Wang, 2017. "Adaptive contrast weighted learning for multi-stage multi-treatment decision-making," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 73(1), pages 145-155, March.
    13. Early Kirstin & Mankoff Jennifer & Fienberg Stephen E., 2017. "Dynamic Question Ordering in Online Surveys," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 33(3), pages 625-657, September.
    14. Nakagawa, Tomoyuki & Watanabe, Hiroki & Hyodo, Masashi, 2021. "Kick-one-out-based variable selection method for Euclidean distance-based classifier in high-dimensional settings," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    15. Nina Zhou & Lu Wang & Daniel Almirall, 2023. "Estimating tree‐based dynamic treatment regimes using observational data with restricted treatment sequences," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(3), pages 2260-2271, September.
    16. Lan Wen & Miguel A. Hernán & James M. Robins, 2022. "Multiply robust estimators of causal effects for survival outcomes," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 49(3), pages 1304-1328, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:metcap:v:25:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1007_s11009-023-10030-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.