IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/metcap/v20y2018i1d10.1007_s11009-017-9562-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparisons Between Largest Order Statistics from Multiple-outlier Models with Dependence

Author

Listed:
  • Jorge Navarro

    (Universidad de Murcia)

  • Nuria Torrado

    (Universidad Autónoma de Madrid)

  • Yolanda del Águila

    (Universidad de Almería)

Abstract

We study stochastic comparisons between the largest order statistics from samples which may contain outliers. The data in each sample can also be dependent. Under these assumptions we study three cases. In the first one we consider the general case without additional assumptions. In the second we assume that the data come from two different distributions. In the third one we assume that the data come from a proportional hazard rates model. The results obtained here can be applied to compare parallel systems. Some illustrative examples are provided.

Suggested Citation

  • Jorge Navarro & Nuria Torrado & Yolanda del Águila, 2018. "Comparisons Between Largest Order Statistics from Multiple-outlier Models with Dependence," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 411-433, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:metcap:v:20:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1007_s11009-017-9562-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s11009-017-9562-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11009-017-9562-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11009-017-9562-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jorge Navarro & Fabio Spizzichino, 2010. "Comparisons of series and parallel systems with components sharing the same copula," Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(6), pages 775-791, November.
    2. Michel Grabisch & Jean-Luc Marichal & Radko Mesiar & Endre Pap, 2009. "Aggregation functions," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00445120, HAL.
    3. Navarro, Jorge & Rychlik, Tomasz, 2010. "Comparisons and bounds for expected lifetimes of reliability systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(1), pages 309-317, November.
    4. Misra, Neeraj & Misra, Amit Kumar, 2012. "New results on stochastic comparisons of two-component series and parallel systems," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 82(2), pages 283-290.
    5. Rodríguez-Lallena, José Antonio & Úbeda-Flores, Manuel, 2004. "A new class of bivariate copulas," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 66(3), pages 315-325, February.
    6. Jorge Navarro & M. Carmen Gomis, 2016. "Comparisons in the mean residual life order of coherent systems with identically distributed components," Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(1), pages 33-47, January.
    7. Navarro, Jorge & Pellerey, Franco & Di Crescenzo, Antonio, 2015. "Orderings of coherent systems with randomized dependent components," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 240(1), pages 127-139.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Torrado, Nuria, 2022. "Optimal component-type allocation and replacement time policies for parallel systems having multi-types dependent components," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    2. Antonio Di Crescenzo & Abdolsaeed Toomaj, 2022. "Weighted Mean Inactivity Time Function with Applications," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(16), pages 1-30, August.
    3. Jorge Navarro & Franco Pellerey & Miguel A. Sordo, 2020. "Weak Dependence Notions and Their Mutual Relationships," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-27, December.
    4. Sangita Das & Suchandan Kayal, 2020. "Ordering extremes of exponentiated location-scale models with dependent and heterogeneous random samples," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 83(8), pages 869-893, November.
    5. Navarro, Jorge & Fernández-Martínez, Pedro, 2021. "Redundancy in systems with heterogeneous dependent components," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(2), pages 766-778.
    6. Jorge Navarro, 2018. "Stochastic comparisons of coherent systems," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 81(4), pages 465-482, May.
    7. Torrado, Nuria & Arriaza, Antonio & Navarro, Jorge, 2021. "A study on multi-level redundancy allocation in coherent systems formed by modules," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Navarro, Jorge & Durante, Fabrizio, 2017. "Copula-based representations for the reliability of the residual lifetimes of coherent systems with dependent components," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 87-102.
    2. Jorge Navarro & Maria Longobardi & Franco Pellerey, 2017. "Comparison results for inactivity times of k-out-of-n and general coherent systems with dependent components," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 26(4), pages 822-846, December.
    3. Jorge Navarro, 2018. "Distribution-free comparisons of residual lifetimes of coherent systems based on copula properties," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 59(2), pages 781-800, June.
    4. Navarro, Jorge & Arriaza, Antonio & Suárez-Llorens, Alfonso, 2019. "Minimal repair of failed components in coherent systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 279(3), pages 951-964.
    5. Jorge Navarro & Yolanda Águila, 2017. "Stochastic comparisons of distorted distributions, coherent systems and mixtures with ordered components," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 80(6), pages 627-648, November.
    6. Gupta, Nitin & Misra, Neeraj & Kumar, Somesh, 2015. "Stochastic comparisons of residual lifetimes and inactivity times of coherent systems with dependent identically distributed components," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 240(2), pages 425-430.
    7. Jørgen Vitting Andersen & Roy Cerqueti & Giulia Rotundo, 2017. "Rational expectations and stochastic systems," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 17060, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne, revised Oct 2019.
    8. M. Salehi & Z. Shishebor & M. Asadi, 2019. "On the reliability modeling of weighted k-out-of-n systems with randomly chosen components," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 82(5), pages 589-605, July.
    9. Serkan Eryilmaz & Frank P.A. Coolen & Tahani Coolen‐Maturi, 2018. "Mean residual life of coherent systems consisting of multiple types of dependent components," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 65(1), pages 86-97, February.
    10. Jorge Navarro & Yolanda Águila & Miguel A. Sordo & Alfonso Suárez-Llorens, 2016. "Preservation of Stochastic Orders under the Formation of Generalized Distorted Distributions. Applications to Coherent Systems," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 529-545, June.
    11. Navarro, Jorge & Pellerey, Franco & Di Crescenzo, Antonio, 2015. "Orderings of coherent systems with randomized dependent components," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 240(1), pages 127-139.
    12. M. Kelkinnama & M. Asadi, 2019. "Stochastic and ageing properties of coherent systems with dependent identically distributed components," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 60(3), pages 805-821, June.
    13. Borgonovo, Emanuele & Aliee, Hananeh & Glaß, Michael & Teich, Jürgen, 2016. "A new time-independent reliability importance measure," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 254(2), pages 427-442.
    14. Parsa, Motahareh & Di Crescenzo, Antonio & Jabbari, Hadi, 2018. "Analysis of reliability systems via Gini-type index," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 264(1), pages 340-353.
    15. Elham Khaleghpanah Noughabi & Majid Chahkandi & Majid Rezaei, 2022. "On the Mean and Variance Residual Life Comparisons of Coherent Systems with Identically Distributed Components," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 2801-2822, December.
    16. Chen Li & Xiaohu Li, 2020. "Weak aging properties for coherent systems with statistically dependent component lifetimes," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 67(7), pages 559-572, October.
    17. Luca Anzilli & Silvio Giove, 2020. "Multi-criteria and medical diagnosis for application to health insurance systems: a general approach through non-additive measures," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 43(2), pages 559-582, December.
    18. Gaofeng Da & Lvyu Xia & Taizhong Hu, 2014. "On Computing Signatures of k-out-of-n Systems Consisting of Modules," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 223-233, March.
    19. Zarezadeh, S. & Mohammadi, L. & Balakrishnan, N., 2018. "On the joint signature of several coherent systems with some shared components," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 264(3), pages 1092-1100.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:metcap:v:20:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1007_s11009-017-9562-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.