IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joinma/v35y2024i3d10.1007_s10845-023-02108-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison and explanation of data-driven modeling for weld quality prediction in resistance spot welding

Author

Listed:
  • Matthew Russell

    (University of Kentucky)

  • Joseph Kershaw

    (University of Kentucky)

  • Yujun Xia

    (Shanghai Jiao Tong University)

  • Tianle Lv

    (Shanghai Jiao Tong University)

  • Yongbing Li

    (Shanghai Jiao Tong University)

  • Hassan Ghassemi-Armaki

    (General Motors)

  • Blair E. Carlson

    (General Motors)

  • Peng Wang

    (University of Kentucky
    University of Kentucky)

Abstract

Resistance spot welding (RSW) is an important manufacturing process across major industries due to its high production speed and ease of automation. Though conceptually straightforward, the process combines complex electrical, thermal, fluidic, and mechanical phenomena to permanently assemble sheet metal components. These complex process dynamics make RSW prone to inconsistencies, even with modern automation techniques. This motivates online process monitoring and quality evaluation systems for quality assurance. This study investigates in-situ process sensing and neural networks-based modeling to understand key aspects of RSW process monitoring and offers three contributions: (1) a comparison of two data-driven modeling approaches, a feature-based Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) and a raw sensing-based convolutional neural network (CNN), (2) a comparison of how electrical and mechanical sensing data affect the model’s performance, and (3) an explanation of MLP behavior using Shapley Additive Explanation (SHAP) values to interpret the contribution of sensing features to weld quality metric predictions. Both the MLP and CNN can predict weld quality metrics (e.g., nugget geometry) and detect a process defect (i.e., expulsion) using in-situ current and resistance sensing signals. Including force and displacement measurements improved performance, and the SHAP values revealed salient features underlying the RSW process (e.g., displacement contributes significantly to predicting axial nugget growth). Future work will explore additional architectural developments, explore ways to translate lab-developed models to production plants, and leverage these models to optimize RSW processes and improve quality consistency.

Suggested Citation

  • Matthew Russell & Joseph Kershaw & Yujun Xia & Tianle Lv & Yongbing Li & Hassan Ghassemi-Armaki & Blair E. Carlson & Peng Wang, 2024. "Comparison and explanation of data-driven modeling for weld quality prediction in resistance spot welding," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 35(3), pages 1305-1319, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:joinma:v:35:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s10845-023-02108-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s10845-023-02108-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10845-023-02108-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10845-023-02108-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joinma:v:35:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s10845-023-02108-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.