IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joiaen/v13y2024i1d10.1186_s13731-023-00360-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The RRI Citizen Review Panel: a public engagement method for supporting responsible territorial policymaking

Author

Listed:
  • Maya Vestergaard Bidstrup

    (Danish Board of Technology)

  • Snezhina Gabova

    (Sofia Development Association)

  • Pavlos Kilintzis

    (University of Western Macedonia)

  • Elpida Samara

    (University of Western Macedonia)

  • Amalia Kouskoura

    (University of Western Macedonia)

  • Yiannis Bakouros

    (University of Western Macedonia)

  • Florian Roth

    (Zurich University of Applied Sciences)

Abstract

Responsible Territorial Policymaking incorporates the main principles of Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) into the policymaking process, making it well-suited for guiding the development of sustainable and resilient territorial policies that prioritise societal needs. As a cornerstone in RRI, public engagement plays a central role in this process, underscoring the importance of involving all societal actors to align outcomes with the needs, expectations, and values of society. In the absence of existing methods to gather sufficiently and effectively the citizens’ review of multiple policies at a territorial level, the RRI Citizen Review Panel is a new public engagement method developed to facilitate citizens’ review and validation of territorial policies. By using RRI as an analytical framework, this paper examines whether the RRI Citizen Review Panel can support Responsible Territorial Policymaking, not only by incorporating citizens’ perspectives into territorial policymaking, but also by making policies more responsible. The paper demonstrates that in the review of territorial policies, citizens are adding elements of RRI to a wide range of policies within different policy areas, contributing to making policies more responsible. Consequently, the RRI Citizen Review Panel emerges as a valuable tool for policymakers, enabling them to gather citizen perspectives and imbue policies with a heightened sense of responsibility.

Suggested Citation

  • Maya Vestergaard Bidstrup & Snezhina Gabova & Pavlos Kilintzis & Elpida Samara & Amalia Kouskoura & Yiannis Bakouros & Florian Roth, 2024. "The RRI Citizen Review Panel: a public engagement method for supporting responsible territorial policymaking," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 1-34, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:joiaen:v:13:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1186_s13731-023-00360-6
    DOI: 10.1186/s13731-023-00360-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1186/s13731-023-00360-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1186/s13731-023-00360-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joiaen:v:13:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1186_s13731-023-00360-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.