IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joheur/v25y2019i3d10.1007_s10732-019-09407-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Parallelism in divide-and-conquer non-dominated sorting: a theoretical study considering the PRAM-CREW model

Author

Listed:
  • Sumit Mishra

    (CINVESTAV-IPN
    Indian Institute of Information Technology Guwahati)

  • Carlos A. Coello Coello

    (CINVESTAV-IPN)

Abstract

Non-dominated sorting is a crucial component of Pareto-based multi- and many-objective evolutionary algorithms. As the number of objectives increases, the execution time of a multi-objective evolutionary algorithm increases, too. Since multi-objective evolutionary algorithms normally have a low data dependency, research-ers have increasingly adopted parallel programming techniques to reduce their execution time. Evidently, it is also desirable to parallelize non-dominated sorting. There are some recent proposals which focus on the parallelization of non-dominated sorting, with a particular emphasis on a very well-known approach called fast non-dominated sorting. In this paper, however, we explore the scope of parallelism in an approach called divide-and-conquer based non-dominated sorting (DCNS), which we recently introduced. This paper explores the parallelism from a theoretical point of view. The parallelization of the DCNS approach has been explored considering the PRAM-CREW (Parallel Random Access Machine, Concurrent Read Exclusive Write) model. The analysis of parallel algorithms is usually carried out under the assumption that an unbounded number of processors are available. So, in our analysis, we have also considered the same assumption. The time and space complexities of the parallel version of the DCNS approach is obtained in different scenarios. The time complexity of the parallel version of the DCNS approach in different scenarios is proved to be $$\mathcal {O}(\log M + N)$$ O ( log M + N ) . We have also obtained the maximum number of processors which can be required by the parallel version of the DCNS approach. The comparison of the parallel version of the DCNS approach with respect to some other approaches is also performed.

Suggested Citation

  • Sumit Mishra & Carlos A. Coello Coello, 2019. "Parallelism in divide-and-conquer non-dominated sorting: a theoretical study considering the PRAM-CREW model," Journal of Heuristics, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 455-483, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:joheur:v:25:y:2019:i:3:d:10.1007_s10732-019-09407-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s10732-019-09407-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10732-019-09407-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10732-019-09407-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. G. Ortega & E. Filatovas & E. M. Garzón & L. G. Casado, 2017. "Non-dominated sorting procedure for Pareto dominance ranking on multicore CPU and/or GPU," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 69(3), pages 607-627, November.
    2. J. J. Moreno & G. Ortega & E. Filatovas & J. A. Martínez & E. M. Garzón, 2018. "Improving the performance and energy of Non-Dominated Sorting for evolutionary multiobjective optimization on GPU/CPU platforms," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 71(3), pages 631-649, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. E. Filatovas & O. Kurasova & J. L. Redondo & J. Fernández, 2020. "A reference point-based evolutionary algorithm for approximating regions of interest in multiobjective problems," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 28(2), pages 402-423, July.
    2. J. J. Moreno & G. Ortega & E. Filatovas & J. A. Martínez & E. M. Garzón, 2018. "Improving the performance and energy of Non-Dominated Sorting for evolutionary multiobjective optimization on GPU/CPU platforms," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 71(3), pages 631-649, July.
    3. Ana Maria A. C. Rocha & M. Fernanda P. Costa & Edite M. G. P. Fernandes, 2018. "Preface to the Special Issue “GOW’16”," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 71(3), pages 441-442, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joheur:v:25:y:2019:i:3:d:10.1007_s10732-019-09407-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.