IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joheur/v23y2017i5d10.1007_s10732-017-9346-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On branching heuristics for the bi-objective 0/1 unidimensional knapsack problem

Author

Listed:
  • Audrey Cerqueus

    (Mines Saint-Étienne)

  • Xavier Gandibleux

    (Université de Nantes)

  • Anthony Przybylski

    (Université de Nantes)

  • Frédéric Saubion

    (Université d’Angers)

Abstract

This paper focuses on branching strategies that are involved in branch and bound algorithms when solving multi-objective optimization problems. The choice of the branching variable at each node of the search tree constitutes indeed an important component of these algorithms. In this work we focus on multi-objective knapsack problems. In the literature, branching heuristics used for these problems are static, i.e., the order on the variables is determined prior to the execution. This study investigates the benefit of defining more sophisticated branching strategies. We first analyze and compare a representative set of classic branching heuristics and conclude that none can be identified as the best overall heuristic. Using an oracle, we highlight that combining branching heuristics within the same branch and bound algorithm leads to considerably reduced search trees but induces high computational costs. Based on learning adaptive techniques, we propose then dynamic adaptive branching strategies that are able to select the suitable heuristic to apply at each node of the search tree. Experiments are conducted on the bi-objective 0/1 unidimensional knapsack problem.

Suggested Citation

  • Audrey Cerqueus & Xavier Gandibleux & Anthony Przybylski & Frédéric Saubion, 2017. "On branching heuristics for the bi-objective 0/1 unidimensional knapsack problem," Journal of Heuristics, Springer, vol. 23(5), pages 285-319, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:joheur:v:23:y:2017:i:5:d:10.1007_s10732-017-9346-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s10732-017-9346-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10732-017-9346-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10732-017-9346-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Przybylski, Anthony & Gandibleux, Xavier, 2017. "Multi-objective branch and bound," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 260(3), pages 856-872.
    2. Peter J. Kolesar, 1967. "A Branch and Bound Algorithm for the Knapsack Problem," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 13(9), pages 723-735, May.
    3. José Figueira & Luís Paquete & Marco Simões & Daniel Vanderpooten, 2013. "Algorithmic improvements on dynamic programming for the bi-objective {0,1} knapsack problem," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 56(1), pages 97-111, September.
    4. Fred Glover, 1965. "A Multiphase-Dual Algorithm for the Zero-One Integer Programming Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 13(6), pages 879-919, December.
    5. Zhang, Weihua & Reimann, Marc, 2014. "A simple augmented ∊-constraint method for multi-objective mathematical integer programming problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 234(1), pages 15-24.
    6. Francis Sourd & Olivier Spanjaard, 2008. "A Multiobjective Branch-and-Bound Framework: Application to the Biobjective Spanning Tree Problem," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 20(3), pages 472-484, August.
    7. Florios, Kostas & Mavrotas, George & Diakoulaki, Danae, 2010. "Solving multiobjective, multiconstraint knapsack problems using mathematical programming and evolutionary algorithms," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 203(1), pages 14-21, May.
    8. Y. P. Aneja & K. P. K. Nair, 1979. "Bicriteria Transportation Problem," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(1), pages 73-78, January.
    9. Silvano Martello & David Pisinger & Paolo Toth, 1999. "Dynamic Programming and Strong Bounds for the 0-1 Knapsack Problem," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(3), pages 414-424, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rong, Aiying & Figueira, José Rui, 2014. "Dynamic programming algorithms for the bi-objective integer knapsack problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 236(1), pages 85-99.
    2. Sune Lauth Gadegaard & Lars Relund Nielsen & Matthias Ehrgott, 2019. "Bi-objective Branch-and-Cut Algorithms Based on LP Relaxation and Bound Sets," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 31(4), pages 790-804, October.
    3. Przybylski, Anthony & Gandibleux, Xavier, 2017. "Multi-objective branch and bound," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 260(3), pages 856-872.
    4. Cacchiani, Valentina & D’Ambrosio, Claudia, 2017. "A branch-and-bound based heuristic algorithm for convex multi-objective MINLPs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 260(3), pages 920-933.
    5. David Bergman & Merve Bodur & Carlos Cardonha & Andre A. Cire, 2022. "Network Models for Multiobjective Discrete Optimization," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(2), pages 990-1005, March.
    6. Cerqueus, Audrey & Przybylski, Anthony & Gandibleux, Xavier, 2015. "Surrogate upper bound sets for bi-objective bi-dimensional binary knapsack problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(2), pages 417-433.
    7. Satya Tamby & Daniel Vanderpooten, 2021. "Enumeration of the Nondominated Set of Multiobjective Discrete Optimization Problems," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 33(1), pages 72-85, January.
    8. Yuji Nakagawa & Ross J. W. James & César Rego & Chanaka Edirisinghe, 2014. "Entropy-Based Optimization of Nonlinear Separable Discrete Decision Models," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(3), pages 695-707, March.
    9. Fattahi, Ali & Turkay, Metin, 2018. "A one direction search method to find the exact nondominated frontier of biobjective mixed-binary linear programming problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 266(2), pages 415-425.
    10. Alidaee, Bahram, 2014. "Zero duality gap in surrogate constraint optimization: A concise review of models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 232(2), pages 241-248.
    11. Thomas Stidsen & Kim Allan Andersen & Bernd Dammann, 2014. "A Branch and Bound Algorithm for a Class of Biobjective Mixed Integer Programs," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(4), pages 1009-1032, April.
    12. Enrique Machuca & Lawrence Mandow, 2016. "Lower bound sets for biobjective shortest path problems," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 64(1), pages 63-77, January.
    13. Mavrotas, George & Florios, Kostas, 2013. "An improved version of the augmented epsilon-constraint method (AUGMECON2) for finding the exact Pareto set in Multi-Objective Integer Programming problems," MPRA Paper 105034, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Forget, Nicolas & Gadegaard, Sune Lauth & Nielsen, Lars Relund, 2022. "Warm-starting lower bound set computations for branch-and-bound algorithms for multi objective integer linear programs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 302(3), pages 909-924.
    15. Dächert, Kerstin & Klamroth, Kathrin & Lacour, Renaud & Vanderpooten, Daniel, 2017. "Efficient computation of the search region in multi-objective optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 260(3), pages 841-855.
    16. Nathan Adelgren & Akshay Gupte, 2022. "Branch-and-Bound for Biobjective Mixed-Integer Linear Programming," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(2), pages 909-933, March.
    17. Alvaro Sierra Altamiranda & Hadi Charkhgard, 2019. "A New Exact Algorithm to Optimize a Linear Function over the Set of Efficient Solutions for Biobjective Mixed Integer Linear Programs," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 31(4), pages 823-840, October.
    18. I. Kaliszewski & J. Miroforidis, 2022. "Probing the Pareto front of a large-scale multiobjective problem with a MIP solver," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(5), pages 5617-5673, November.
    19. Vladimir I. Norkin, 2019. "B&B method for discrete partial order optimization," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 577-592, October.
    20. Markus Leitner & Ivana Ljubić & Markus Sinnl, 2015. "A Computational Study of Exact Approaches for the Bi-Objective Prize-Collecting Steiner Tree Problem," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 27(1), pages 118-134, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joheur:v:23:y:2017:i:5:d:10.1007_s10732-017-9346-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.