IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jknowl/v5y2014i3p427-439.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Thinking Beyond The Box: Game-Theoretic and Living Lab Approaches to Innovation Policy and Practice Improvement

Author

Listed:
  • Elias Carayannis
  • Igor Dubina

Abstract

This paper addresses a complex problem of finding optimal or suboptimal strategies and business decisions of (1) entrepreneurs, inventors, innovators, and other “economic actors” who are engaged, or want and can be engaged, in innovation activities, and (2) policymakers who want to secure both stability and development of a national or regional political and economic system. In contrast to many papers which separately discuss innovation behavior and innovation policies, our research aims to fill such a gap and show how these aspects are integrated. The authors suggest and present both qualitative and quantitative approaches using game-theoretic analysis and living lab simulation what triggers, catalysts and accelerators for entrepreneurial and innovative action and results can be better supported by policy and practice. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Suggested Citation

  • Elias Carayannis & Igor Dubina, 2014. "Thinking Beyond The Box: Game-Theoretic and Living Lab Approaches to Innovation Policy and Practice Improvement," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 5(3), pages 427-439, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:jknowl:v:5:y:2014:i:3:p:427-439
    DOI: 10.1007/s13132-014-0207-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s13132-014-0207-6
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13132-014-0207-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ibrahim Alnafrah & Sulaiman Mouselli, 2019. "The Knowledge Society Vis-à-vis the Knowledge Economy and Their Potential Development Impacts in Russia," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 10(1), pages 205-220, March.
    2. Mêgnigbêto, Eustache, 2018. "Modelling the Triple Helix of university-industry-government relationships with game theory: Core, Shapley value and nucleolus as indicators of synergy within an innovation system," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 12(4), pages 1118-1132.
    3. A. A. Chursin & I. N. Dubina & E. G. Carayannis & A. E. Tyulin & A. V. Yudin, 2022. "Technological Platforms as a Tool for Creating Radical Innovations," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(1), pages 264-275, March.
    4. Van Tran & Amalia Yiannaka & Konstantinos Giannakas, 2019. "Market Potential and Economic Impacts of Food Nanotechnology Innovations," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 10(2), pages 776-811, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Innovation; Game theory; Simulation; Policy; Optimization; Strategy; Risk; Uncertainty; Unpredictability; O20; O30; M130;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O20 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Development Planning and Policy - - - General
    • O30 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jknowl:v:5:y:2014:i:3:p:427-439. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.