IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jhappi/v24y2023i8d10.1007_s10902-023-00690-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Neera Badhwar’s Neo-Aristotelian Well-Being: A Stoic Response

Author

Listed:
  • Matthew Carter Cashen

    (Department of Philosophy, Southern Illinois University Edwardsville)

Abstract

In her 2014 monograph, philosopher Neera Badhwar develops a neo-Aristotelian account of well-being according to which well-being consists in happiness in an objectively worthwhile life. An objectively worthwhile life is a life that is virtuous, but virtue is not enough for well-being: a person also must find pleasure and purpose in what the ancients called “external goods,” that is, goods “external to the soul” like wealth, health, and friendships. Badhwar argues that these goods contribute to well-being directly, and she rejects the Stoic view that they are valuable only as the instruments and material of virtue. In this paper, I defend the Stoic view she rejects and make the case that if one claims that virtue is primary in well-being, as Neo-Aristotelians like Badhwar do, then one should adopt the Stoic view that well-being consists only in virtuous activity. While Badhwar and others dismiss that view as implausible, I defend its plausibility by arguing that its critics misunderstand it.

Suggested Citation

  • Matthew Carter Cashen, 2023. "Neera Badhwar’s Neo-Aristotelian Well-Being: A Stoic Response," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 24(8), pages 2531-2542, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:jhappi:v:24:y:2023:i:8:d:10.1007_s10902-023-00690-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s10902-023-00690-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10902-023-00690-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10902-023-00690-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jhappi:v:24:y:2023:i:8:d:10.1007_s10902-023-00690-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.