IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jglopt/v56y2013i1p61-91.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

New horizons in sphere-packing theory, part II: lattice-based derivative-free optimization via global surrogates

Author

Listed:
  • Paul Belitz
  • Thomas Bewley

Abstract

Derivative-free algorithms are frequently required for the optimization of nonsmooth scalar functions in n dimensions resulting, for example, from physical experiments or from the statistical averaging of numerical simulations of chaotic systems such as turbulent flows. The core idea of all efficient algorithms for problems of this type is to keep function evaluations far apart until convergence is approached. Generalized pattern search (GPS) algorithms, a modern class of methods particularly well suited to such problems, accomplish this by coordinating the search with an underlying grid which is refined, and coarsened, as appropriate. One of the most efficient subclasses of GPS algorithms, known as the surrogate management framework (SMF; see Booker et al. in Struct Multidiscip Optim 17:1–13, 1999 ), alternates between an exploratory search over an interpolating function which summarizes the trends exhibited by existing function evaluations, and an exhaustive poll which checks the function on neighboring points to confirm or confute the local optimality of any given candidate minimum point (CMP) on the underlying grid. The original SMF algorithm implemented a GPS step on an underlying Cartesian grid, augmented with a Kriging-based surrogate search. Rather than using the n-dimensional Cartesian grid (the typical choice), the present work introduces for this purpose the use of lattices derived from n-dimensional sphere packings. As reviewed and analyzed extensively in Part I of this series (see Belitz, PhD dissertation, University of California, San Diego, 2011 , Chap. 2), such lattices are significantly more uniform and have many more nearest neighbors than their Cartesian counterparts. Both of these facts make them far better suited for coordinating GPS algorithms, as demonstrated here in a variety of numerical tests. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2013

Suggested Citation

  • Paul Belitz & Thomas Bewley, 2013. "New horizons in sphere-packing theory, part II: lattice-based derivative-free optimization via global surrogates," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 56(1), pages 61-91, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:jglopt:v:56:y:2013:i:1:p:61-91
    DOI: 10.1007/s10898-012-9866-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s10898-012-9866-7
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10898-012-9866-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pooriya Beyhaghi & Daniele Cavaglieri & Thomas Bewley, 2016. "Delaunay-based derivative-free optimization via global surrogates, part I: linear constraints," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 66(3), pages 331-382, November.
    2. Pooriya Beyhaghi & Thomas R. Bewley, 2016. "Delaunay-based derivative-free optimization via global surrogates, part II: convex constraints," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 66(3), pages 383-415, November.
    3. Ryan Alimo & Pooriya Beyhaghi & Thomas R. Bewley, 2020. "Delaunay-based derivative-free optimization via global surrogates. Part III: nonconvex constraints," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 77(4), pages 743-776, August.
    4. Pooriya Beyhaghi & Thomas Bewley, 2017. "Implementation of Cartesian grids to accelerate Delaunay-based derivative-free optimization," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 69(4), pages 927-949, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jglopt:v:56:y:2013:i:1:p:61-91. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.