IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jenvss/v5y2015i1p21-28.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Defining “Ecolinguistics?”: Challenging emic issues in an evolving environmental discipline

Author

Listed:
  • Todd LeVasseur

Abstract

Ecolinguistics is an emerging field of study within the social sciences, with implications for all domains of knowledge production. From its initial emergence within the field of linguistics in the early 1990s, it has meant different things to different scholars, so to date lacks a coherent self definition. Some scholars interpret ecolinguistics to mean the iterative interaction between human discourses and the natural world; others view it as the study of the ecology of language; while others suggest it deals with declining linguistic diversity, broadly. Dr. Arran Stibbe, the convener of the Language and Ecology Forum, generated an informal, 10-year retrospective survey in December 2012 and January 2013, with the goal of the survey to help generate emic conceptions of what ecolinguistics means to various scholars engaged in ecolinguistics. This article summarizes the findings of this survey, while also giving a brief overview of the history of ecolinguistics. It is argued by the author that ecolinguistics represents an emergent, leading edge of the “Ecological Turn” for the past 40 years in academia, and that the insights and methods of ecolinguistics are an underappreciated and underutilized approach to studying human-nature interactions. It is also argued that it would be helpful to both non-specialists and ecolinguists, if in the coming years the field converges around a consensus of ideas that help to provide it with theoretical stability and methodological clarity so ecolinguistics can be better utilized by those working in the AESS. Copyright AESS 2015

Suggested Citation

  • Todd LeVasseur, 2015. "Defining “Ecolinguistics?”: Challenging emic issues in an evolving environmental discipline," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 5(1), pages 21-28, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:jenvss:v:5:y:2015:i:1:p:21-28
    DOI: 10.1007/s13412-014-0198-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s13412-014-0198-4
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13412-014-0198-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James Proctor & Susan Clark & Kimberly Smith & Richard Wallace, 2013. "A manifesto for theory in environmental studies and sciences," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 3(3), pages 331-337, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xuliang Zhang & Zhanting Bu & Hongrun Ju & Yibo Jing, 2022. "Investigation on the Relationship between Biodiversity and Linguistic Diversity in China and Its Formation Mechanism," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-19, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. James D. Proctor & Jennifer Bernstein & Philip Brick & Emma Brush & Susan Caplow & Kenneth Foster, 2018. "Environmental engagement in troubled times: a manifesto," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 8(3), pages 362-367, September.
    2. James D. Proctor, 2020. "EcoTypes: exploring environmental ideas, discovering deep difference," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 10(2), pages 178-188, June.
    3. James D. Proctor, 2016. "Replacing nature in environmental studies and sciences," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 6(4), pages 748-752, December.
    4. Michael Maniates & Thomas Princen, 2015. "Fifteen claims: social change and power in environmental studies," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 5(2), pages 213-217, June.
    5. Shirley Vincent & Stephen Mulkey, 2015. "Transforming US higher education to support sustainability science for a resilient future: the influence of institutional administrative organization," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 341-363, April.
    6. James Proctor & Jennifer Bernstein & Richard Wallace, 2015. "Introduction: unsettling the ESS curriculum," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 5(2), pages 195-199, June.
    7. Eve Z. Bratman & William P. DeLince, 2022. "Dismantling white supremacy in environmental studies and sciences: an argument for anti-racist and decolonizing pedagogies," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 12(2), pages 193-203, June.
    8. Teresa Lloro-Bidart & Michael H. Finewood, 2018. "Intersectional feminism for the environmental studies and sciences: looking inward and outward," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 8(2), pages 142-151, June.
    9. James Proctor, 2015. "Theory in, theory out: NCSE and the ESS curriculum," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 5(2), pages 218-223, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jenvss:v:5:y:2015:i:1:p:21-28. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.