IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/infsem/v21y2023i3d10.1007_s10257-023-00642-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Towards measuring and quantifying the comprehensibility of process models: the process model comprehension framework

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Winter

    (Ulm University)

  • Rudiger Pryss

    (University of Würzburg)

  • Matthias Fink

    (Ventum Consulting GmbH & Co. KG)

  • Manfred Reichert

    (Ulm University)

Abstract

Process models constitute crucial artifacts in modern information systems, and their proper comprehension is of utmost importance in utilizing such systems. Generally, process models are considered from two different perspectives: process modelers and readers. Both perspectives share similarities and differences in the comprehension of process models (e.g., diverse experiences when working with process models). The literature proposed many rules and guidelines to ensure proper comprehension of process models for both perspectives. As a novel contribution in this context, this paper introduces the process model comprehension framework (PMCF), constituting a first approach towards the measurement and quantification of the perspectives of process modelers and readers, as well as the interaction of both regarding the comprehension of process models. Therefore, the PMCF describes an Evaluation theory tree based on the communication theory and the conceptual modeling quality framework and considers a total of 96 quality metrics to quantify process model comprehension. Furthermore, the PMCF was evaluated in a survey with 131 participants and has been implemented and applied successfully in a practical case study including 33 participants. To conclude, the PMCF allows for the identification of pitfalls and provides related information about how to assist process modelers and readers in fostering and enabling a proper comprehension of process models.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Winter & Rudiger Pryss & Matthias Fink & Manfred Reichert, 2023. "Towards measuring and quantifying the comprehensibility of process models: the process model comprehension framework," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 723-751, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:infsem:v:21:y:2023:i:3:d:10.1007_s10257-023-00642-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s10257-023-00642-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10257-023-00642-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10257-023-00642-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:infsem:v:21:y:2023:i:3:d:10.1007_s10257-023-00642-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.