IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/ijsaem/v13y2022i4d10.1007_s13198-021-01551-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Software validation based on prioritization using concurrent activity diagram

Author

Listed:
  • Vikas Panthi

    (VIT Bhopal University)

  • Aprna Tripathi

    (VIT Bhopal University)

  • Durga Prasad Mohapatra

    (National Institute of Technology)

Abstract

Quality of developed software totally relies upon three factors the time, effort and testing technique used for testing. Normally in large organizations, the development team allocates a high portion of estimated development time for software testing. Therefore, efficient algorithm needed for designing optimized test scenarios. Proposed approach can be apply on large and complex software. One of the most crucial and tedious task in SDLC is the generation of test scenario specially for large and complex problems. Generation as well as to execution of large number of test cases consumes high portion of effort and duration of total development effort and duration respectively. Therefore automatic testing has become the necessity of software industry specially large scale software development organization to reduce the testing cost to develop qualitative product. Also its very impractical to execute complete set of test case due to limited time and cost, the prioritization of test case is the solution to improve the software quality. Paper proposes a modelling based testing approach to generate test scenarios that uses UML activity diagram (AD). To prioritized the test cases average percentage fault detection (APFD) metrics is used. the proposed approach carries two phases, In the first phase specification information of AD is transferred into an arbitrary and testable graph called activity interaction graph using proposed parser. To execute the second phase a algorithm named TSPACO: the combination of DFS and BFS is proposed. In second phase TSPACO is applied to generate test scenarios with respect to decision and concurrent criteria to prioritize the test scenarios. The proposed model generates prioritized test scenarios according to strength values of different types of activity diagram which are- forks, joins and merge point’, developed by using the proposed TSPACO algorithm. Using the APFD metric, effectiveness of the generated test scenarios is computed. The experimental results shows that test cases generated by proposed approach have 14% more effectiveness than the other existing approaches.

Suggested Citation

  • Vikas Panthi & Aprna Tripathi & Durga Prasad Mohapatra, 2022. "Software validation based on prioritization using concurrent activity diagram," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 13(4), pages 1801-1816, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:ijsaem:v:13:y:2022:i:4:d:10.1007_s13198-021-01551-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s13198-021-01551-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13198-021-01551-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13198-021-01551-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:ijsaem:v:13:y:2022:i:4:d:10.1007_s13198-021-01551-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.