Author
Listed:
- Joyeeta Gupta
(University of Amsterdam
IHE Delft Institute for Water Education)
- Yang Chen
(University of Amsterdam)
- David I. Armstrong Mckay
(Stockholm University
University of Exeter
Georesilience Analytics)
- Paola Fezzigna
(University of Amsterdam)
- Giuliana Gentile
(University of Amsterdam)
- Aljoscha Karg
(University of Amsterdam)
- Luc Vliet
(University of Amsterdam)
- Steven J. Lade
(Stockholm University
Future Earth Secretariat
Australian National University)
- Lisa Jacobson
(Future Earth Secretariat)
Abstract
The Paris Agreement has seen the adoption of a 1.5° to 2 °C climate target, based on the belief that climate change becomes ‘dangerous’ above this level. Since then, the scientific community and the countries most affected by global warming have reiterated that the maximum limit to be reached should be 1.5 °C. This paper goes one step further by questioning the reasoning behind the adoption of these targets, arguing that the fossil fuel-dependent political context in which they were adopted has undermined justice concerns. We highlight the political influence of the fossil fuels industry within target-setting negotiations, analyzing the evolution of climate targets and fossil fuel lobbying. We then harness published scientific evidence and the Earth System Justice framework to analyze the impacts of the 1.5 °C target, and the injustices that have so far been implicitly deemed acceptable. We argue that 1 °C would have been a far more just target and was undermined by vested interests and status quo maintenance. Finally, we propose just supply-side policies to ensure an adequate placement of responsibility on the fossil fuel industry. This way we (a) identify political influences and scientific blind spots that have and could continue to hinder climate action, (b) reveal how these influences delayed more ambitious climate objectives, contributing to the adoption of an unjust climate target, and (c) promote a focus on supply-side measures and polluting industries in order to break free from the impasse in the energy transition and foster more just outcomes.
Suggested Citation
Joyeeta Gupta & Yang Chen & David I. Armstrong Mckay & Paola Fezzigna & Giuliana Gentile & Aljoscha Karg & Luc Vliet & Steven J. Lade & Lisa Jacobson, 2024.
"Applying earth system justice to phase out fossil fuels: learning from the injustice of adopting 1.5 °C over 1 °C,"
International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 233-255, March.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:ieaple:v:24:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s10784-024-09628-y
DOI: 10.1007/s10784-024-09628-y
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:ieaple:v:24:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s10784-024-09628-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.