IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/grdene/v24y2015i6d10.1007_s10726-015-9427-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Preference Elicitation for Group Decisions Using the Borda Voting Rule

Author

Listed:
  • Lihi Naamani-Dery

    (Ariel University)

  • Inon Golan

    (Ben Gurion University)

  • Meir Kalech

    (Ben Gurion University)

  • Lior Rokach

    (Ben Gurion University)

Abstract

This paper addresses the issue of preference elicitation for group decision making using voting rules. We propose a general, domain-free framework for preference management, where the goal is to minimize the communication cost with the users. We introduce novel heuristics and show how they can operate under a ranking voting protocol, specifically under the Borda protocol. We suggest an interactive incremental framework where at each step one user is queried for her ranking order of two items. We propose two approaches for heuristics that determine what query to select next (i.e., whom to query regarding what item or items). One heuristic computes the information gain of each potential query. The other heuristic uses the probability distribution of the voters’ preferences to select the candidate most likely to win and the voter that is expected to maximize the score of that item. Both heuristics rely on probabilistic rating distributions. We show how these distributions can be estimated. The rating distributions are updated iteratively, allowing their accuracy to increase over time. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our framework by evaluating the different heuristics on two real-world datasets.

Suggested Citation

  • Lihi Naamani-Dery & Inon Golan & Meir Kalech & Lior Rokach, 2015. "Preference Elicitation for Group Decisions Using the Borda Voting Rule," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 24(6), pages 1015-1033, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:grdene:v:24:y:2015:i:6:d:10.1007_s10726-015-9427-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s10726-015-9427-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10726-015-9427-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10726-015-9427-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andrea Berardi & Francesco Rossi, 2002. "Introduction," Economic Notes, Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena SpA, vol. 31(2), pages 197-199, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Aleksandras KRYLOVAS & Natalja KOSAREVA & Edmundas Kazimieras ZAVADSKAS, 2016. "Statistical Analysis of KEMIRA Type Weights Balancing Methods," Journal for Economic Forecasting, Institute for Economic Forecasting, vol. 0(3), pages 19-39, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cristian Carini & Laura Rocca & Claudio Teodori & Monica Veneziani, 2017. "The Reporting Entity in Private-Public Accounting Harmonisation. Is Control Enough for the Local Government Consolidated Financial Statements?," FINANCIAL REPORTING, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2017(1), pages 5-29.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:grdene:v:24:y:2015:i:6:d:10.1007_s10726-015-9427-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.