IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/grdene/v13y2004i2d10.1023_bgrup.0000021840.85686.57.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Influence of Task Load and Automation Trust on Deception Detection

Author

Listed:
  • David P. Biros

    (Air Force Institute of Technology)

  • Mark Daly

    (33rd Information Operation Squadron)

  • Gregg Gunsch

    (Department of Engineering and Computer Science)

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to investigate the effects that user task load level has on the relationship between an individual's trust in and subsequent use of a system's automation. Military decision-makers trust and use information system automation to make many tactical judgments and decisions. In situations of information uncertainty (information warfare environments), decision-makers must remain aware of information reliability issues and temperate their use of system automation if necessary. An individual's task load may have an effect on his use of a system's automation in environments of information uncertainty. It was hypothesized that user task load will have a moderating effect on the positive relationship between system automation trust and use of system automation. Specifically, in situations of information uncertainty (low trust), high task load will have a negative effect on the relationship. To test this hypothesis, an experiment in a simulated command and control micro-world was conducted in which system automation trust and individual task load were manipulated. The findings from the experiment support the positive relationship between automation trust and automation use found in previous research and suggest that task load does have a negative effect on the positive relationship between automation trust and automation use. Experiment participant who incurred a higher task load exhibited an over-reliance on their automated information systems to assist them in their decision-making activities. Such an over-reliance can lead to vulnerabilities of deception and suggests the need for automated deception detection capabilities.

Suggested Citation

  • David P. Biros & Mark Daly & Gregg Gunsch, 2004. "The Influence of Task Load and Automation Trust on Deception Detection," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 13(2), pages 173-189, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:grdene:v:13:y:2004:i:2:d:10.1023_b:grup.0000021840.85686.57
    DOI: 10.1023/B:GRUP.0000021840.85686.57
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1023/B:GRUP.0000021840.85686.57
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1023/B:GRUP.0000021840.85686.57?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:grdene:v:13:y:2004:i:2:d:10.1023_b:grup.0000021840.85686.57. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.