IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/eujoag/v21y2024i1d10.1007_s10433-024-00806-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Polypharmacy, drug-drug interactions, anticholinergic burden and cognitive outcomes: a snapshot from a community-dwelling sample of older men and women in northern Italy

Author

Listed:
  • Elena Perdixi

    (IRCCS Humanitas Clinical and Research Center
    Neuropsychology Lab/Center for Cognitive Disorders and Dementia IRCCS Mondino Foundation)

  • Matteo Cotta Ramusino

    (IRCCS Mondino Foundation
    IRCCS Mondino Foundation)

  • Alfredo Costa

    (IRCCS Mondino Foundation
    IRCCS Mondino Foundation)

  • Sara Bernini

    (Neuropsychology Lab/Center for Cognitive Disorders and Dementia IRCCS Mondino Foundation
    IRCCS Mondino Foundation)

  • Silvia Conti

    (Neuropsychology Lab/Center for Cognitive Disorders and Dementia IRCCS Mondino Foundation
    Institute of Biomedical Technologies - National Research Council)

  • Nithiya Jesuthasan

    (Institute of Biomedical Technologies - National Research Council)

  • Marco Severgnini

    (Institute of Biomedical Technologies - National Research Council)

  • Federica Prinelli

    (Neuropsychology Lab/Center for Cognitive Disorders and Dementia IRCCS Mondino Foundation
    Institute of Biomedical Technologies - National Research Council)

Abstract

Polypharmacy (PP) use is very common in older people and may lead to drug-drug interactions (DDIs) and anticholinergic burden (ACB) that may affect cognitive function. We aimed to determine the occurrence of PP, potential DDIs and ACB and their role in cognitive outcomes in an older population. Cross-sectional data from 636 community-dwelling adults (73.2 ± 6.0 SD, 58.6% women) participating in the NutBrain study (2019–2023) were analyzed. Participants were asked about their medication use, and data on potential DDIs and ACB were extracted. The associations of PP (≥ 5 drugs/day), potential DDIs, and ACB with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and specific cognitive domains were assessed using logistic regression adjusted for confounders. Sex-stratified analysis was performed. Overall, 27.2% of the participants were exposed to PP, 42.3% to potential DDIs and 19% to cumulative ACB. Women were less exposed to PP and more exposed to ACB than men. In multivariate analysis, the odds of having MCI (24%) were three times higher in those with severe ACB (≥ 3) (OR 3.34, 95%CI 1.35–8.25). ACB was positively associated with poor executive function (OR 4.45, 95%CI 1.72–11.49) and specifically with the Frontal Assessment Battery and neuropsychological tests of phonological and semantic fluency. In sex-stratified analysis, ACB was statistically significantly associated with MCI and executive function in women and with memory in men. PP, potential DDIs and anticholinergics use are very common in community-dwelling older people. ACB exposure is associated with MCI, particularly with poor executive function. Clinicians are encouraged to be vigilant when prescribing anticholinergics. Trial registration: Trial registration number NCT04461951, date of registration July 7, 2020 (retrospectively registered, ClinicalTrials.gov).

Suggested Citation

  • Elena Perdixi & Matteo Cotta Ramusino & Alfredo Costa & Sara Bernini & Silvia Conti & Nithiya Jesuthasan & Marco Severgnini & Federica Prinelli, 2024. "Polypharmacy, drug-drug interactions, anticholinergic burden and cognitive outcomes: a snapshot from a community-dwelling sample of older men and women in northern Italy," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 1-14, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:eujoag:v:21:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s10433-024-00806-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s10433-024-00806-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10433-024-00806-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10433-024-00806-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:eujoag:v:21:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s10433-024-00806-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.