IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/eujoag/v19y2022i3d10.1007_s10433-021-00667-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Online assessment of cognitive functioning across the adult lifespan using the eCOGTEL: a reliable alternative to laboratory testing

Author

Listed:
  • M. Haas

    (University of Geneva
    University of Geneva
    Swiss Distance University Institute)

  • S. Scheibe

    (University of Groningen)

  • E. El Khawli

    (University of Groningen)

  • M. Künzi

    (University of Geneva
    Swiss National Centre of Competences in Research LIVES – Overcoming vulnerability: life course perspectives)

  • A. Ihle

    (University of Geneva
    Swiss National Centre of Competences in Research LIVES – Overcoming vulnerability: life course perspectives)

  • N. Ballhausen

    (University of Geneva
    Tilburg University)

  • D. Framorando

    (The University of Queensland)

  • M. Kliegel

    (University of Geneva
    University of Geneva
    Swiss National Centre of Competences in Research LIVES – Overcoming vulnerability: life course perspectives)

  • S. Zuber

    (University of Geneva
    Swiss National Centre of Competences in Research LIVES – Overcoming vulnerability: life course perspectives)

Abstract

As the population ages, risks for cognitive decline threaten independence and quality of life of older adults. Classically, psychological assessment tools that evaluate cognitive functioning are administered in face-to-face laboratory sessions, which are time- and resource-consuming. The present study set out to examine whether the eCOGTEL—an online adaptation of the Cognitive Telephone Screening Instrument (COGTEL; Kliegel et al. in J Psychol 141(2):147–170, 2007)—represents a reliable measure of cognitive performance in adulthood. Therefore, an age-stratified adult lifespan sample of 253 participants (aged 19–86 years) completed a face-to-face assessment in the laboratory and a self-administered online version, at their homes. A second, independent sample of 176 younger adults (aged 19–30 years) performed a test–retest assessment of the eCOGTEL. Results showed strong correlations between overall cognitive scores assessed online and in the laboratory, as well as a high test–retest reliability. Further, comparable data distributions between both assessment modes underline the feasibility of the eCOGTEL across the adult lifespan and particularly in older age. Our findings thereby indicate that the eCOGTEL can reliably measure cognitive performance across the lifespan at reduced costs, which may help detecting individuals at risk of developing age-related cognitive decline. Due to these strengths, the eCOGTEL represents a valuable contemporary approach for the resource-efficient online assessment of cognition, which may benefit a broad array of fundamental and applied research fields, such as clinical and organizational psychology.

Suggested Citation

  • M. Haas & S. Scheibe & E. El Khawli & M. Künzi & A. Ihle & N. Ballhausen & D. Framorando & M. Kliegel & S. Zuber, 2022. "Online assessment of cognitive functioning across the adult lifespan using the eCOGTEL: a reliable alternative to laboratory testing," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 609-619, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:eujoag:v:19:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s10433-021-00667-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s10433-021-00667-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10433-021-00667-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10433-021-00667-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Liljequist & Britt Elfving & Kirsti Skavberg Roaldsen, 2019. "Intraclass correlation – A discussion and demonstration of basic features," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(7), pages 1-35, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kirsti Skavberg Roaldsen & Alexandra Halvarsson, 2019. "Reliability of the Swedish version of the Evidence-Based Practice Attitude Scale assessing physiotherapist’s attitudes to implementation of evidence-based practice," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(11), pages 1-10, November.
    2. Begoña Cueto & Patricia Suárez & Matías Mayor, 2021. "Effects of human capital and regional context on entrepreneurial survival," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 66(2), pages 331-357, April.
    3. Ajax Persaud & Javid Zare, 2023. "Institutional varieties, governance quality, and firm‐level innovation in emerging economies: Case of India," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(1), pages 234-259, March.
    4. Genis Cardona & Noelia Esterich, 2019. "Awareness of treatment: A source of bias in subjective grading of ocular complications," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(12), pages 1-9, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:eujoag:v:19:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s10433-021-00667-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.