IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/eujhec/v3y2002i3p173-179.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A pharmacoeconomic evaluation of zuclopenthixol compared with haloperidol and risperidone in the treatment of schizophrenia

Author

Listed:
  • K. Hansen
  • C. François
  • M. Toumi
  • C. Lançon

Abstract

Zuclopenthixol and haloperidol are antipsychotic medications displaying different galenic forms, while risperidone is available on the market only in tablet form. The depot form presents advantages; the duration of action allows 3–4 weeks between administrations. A meta-analysis showed that zuclopenthixol patients had a higher response rate than haloperidol. A Markov model was developed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of the three antipsychotics in schizophrenia over a 5-year period. Model parameter estimates were based on a meta-analysis and literature. The viewpoint was that of the French National Health Insurance. When compared to haloperidol and risperidone, zuclopenthixol patients had additional 4 and 7 months without relapse correspondingly over a 5-year period. The estimated 5-year medical cost associated with zuclopenthixol was 800 and 1100 euros less than haloperidol and risperidone, respectively, per patient. Sensitivity analyses indicated that the results were robust to changes in key variables. The model indicates that the zuclopenthixol treatment strategy dominates haloperidol and risperidone. Copyright Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2002

Suggested Citation

  • K. Hansen & C. François & M. Toumi & C. Lançon, 2002. "A pharmacoeconomic evaluation of zuclopenthixol compared with haloperidol and risperidone in the treatment of schizophrenia," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 3(3), pages 173-179, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:eujhec:v:3:y:2002:i:3:p:173-179
    DOI: 10.1007/s10198-002-0128-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s10198-002-0128-3
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10198-002-0128-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Simon Frey & Roland Linder & Georg Juckel & Tom Stargardt, 2014. "Cost-effectiveness of long-acting injectable risperidone versus flupentixol decanoate in the treatment of schizophrenia: a Markov model parameterized using administrative data," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 15(2), pages 133-142, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:eujhec:v:3:y:2002:i:3:p:173-179. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.