IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/eujhec/v24y2023i5d10.1007_s10198-022-01505-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing the cost-effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines in a low incidence and low mortality setting: the case of Thailand at start of the pandemic

Author

Listed:
  • Yi Wang

    (National University of Singapore)

  • Nantasit Luangasanatip

    (Mahidol University)

  • Wirichada Pan–ngum

    (Mahidol University)

  • Wanrudee Isaranuwatchai

    (Ministry of Public Health)

  • Juthamas Prawjaeng

    (Ministry of Public Health)

  • Sompob Saralamba

    (Mahidol University)

  • Christopher Painter

    (Mahidol University
    Ministry of Public Health)

  • Jamaica Roanne Briones

    (National University of Singapore)

  • Yot Teerawattananon

    (National University of Singapore
    Ministry of Public Health)

Abstract

Objective This study aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines, preferred COVID-19 vaccine profiles, and the preferred vaccination strategies in Thailand. Methods An age-structured transmission dynamic model was developed based on key local data to evaluate economic consequences, including cost and health outcome in terms of life-years (LYs) saved. We considered COVID-19 vaccines with different profiles and different vaccination strategies such as vaccinating elderly age groups (over 65s) or high-incidence groups, i.e. adults between 20 and 39 years old who have contributed to more than 60% of total COVID-19 cases in the country thus far. Analyses employed a societal perspective in a 1-year time horizon using a cost-effectiveness threshold of 160,000 THB per LY saved. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to identify and characterize uncertainty in the model. Results COVID-19 vaccines that block infection combined with social distancing were cost-saving regardless of the target population compared to social distancing alone (with no vaccination). For vaccines that block infection, the preferred (cost-effective) strategy was to vaccinate the high incidence group. Meanwhile, COVID-19 vaccines that reduces severity (including hospitalization and mortality) were cost-effective when the elderly were vaccinated, while vaccinating the high-incidence group was not cost-effective with this vaccine type. Regardless of vaccine type, higher vaccination coverage, higher efficacy, and longer protection duration were always preferred. More so, vaccination with social distancing measures was always preferred to strategies without social distancing. Quarantine-related costs were a major cost component affecting the cost-effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines. Conclusion COVID-19 vaccines are good value for money even in a relatively low-incidence and low-mortality setting such as Thailand, if the appropriate groups are vaccinated. The preferred vaccination strategies depend on the type of vaccine efficacy. Social distancing measures should accompany a vaccination strategy.

Suggested Citation

  • Yi Wang & Nantasit Luangasanatip & Wirichada Pan–ngum & Wanrudee Isaranuwatchai & Juthamas Prawjaeng & Sompob Saralamba & Christopher Painter & Jamaica Roanne Briones & Yot Teerawattananon, 2023. "Assessing the cost-effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines in a low incidence and low mortality setting: the case of Thailand at start of the pandemic," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 24(5), pages 735-748, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:eujhec:v:24:y:2023:i:5:d:10.1007_s10198-022-01505-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s10198-022-01505-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10198-022-01505-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10198-022-01505-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chris Painter & Wanrudee Isaranuwatchai & Juthamas Prawjaeng & Hwee Lin Wee & Brandon Wen Bing Chua & Vinh Anh Huynh & Jing Lou & Fang Ting Goh & Nantasit Luangasanatip & Wirichada Pan-Ngum & Wang Yi , 2021. "Avoiding Trouble Ahead: Lessons Learned and Suggestions for Economic Evaluations of COVID-19 Vaccines," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 463-472, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:eujhec:v:24:y:2023:i:5:d:10.1007_s10198-022-01505-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.