IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/eujhec/v20y2019i6d10.1007_s10198-019-01051-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determining preventable acute care spending among high-cost patients in a single-payer public health care system

Author

Listed:
  • Claire de Oliveira

    (Institute for Mental Health Policy Research
    University of Toronto
    ICES)

  • Joyce Cheng

    (ICES
    Institute for Mental Health Policy Research)

  • Paul Kurdyak

    (ICES
    Institute for Mental Health Policy Research
    University of Toronto)

Abstract

Background Research has shown that a small proportion of patients account for the majority of health care spending. The objective of this analysis was to determine the amount and proportion of preventable acute care spending among high-cost patients. Methods We examined a population-based sample of all adult high-cost patients using linked administrative health care data housed at ICES in Toronto, Ontario. High-cost patients were defined as those in and above the 90th percentile of the cost distribution. Preventable acute care (emergency department visits and hospitalisations) was defined using validated algorithms. We estimated costs of preventable and non-preventable acute care for high- and non-high-cost patients by category of visit/condition. We replicated our analysis for persistent high-cost patients and high-cost patients under 65 years and those 65 years and older. Results We found that 10% of all acute care spending among high-cost patients was considered preventable; this figure was higher for non-high-cost patients (25%). The proportion of preventable acute care spending was higher for persistent high-cost patients (14%) and those 65 years and older (12%). Among ED visits, the largest portion of preventable care spending was for primary care treatable conditions; for hospitalisations, the highest proportions of preventable care spending were for COPD, bacterial pneumonia and urinary tract infections. Conclusions Although high-cost patients account for a substantial proportion of health care costs, there seems to be limited scope to prevent acute care spending among this patient population. Nonetheless, care coordination and improved access to primary care, and disease prevention may prevent some acute care.

Suggested Citation

  • Claire de Oliveira & Joyce Cheng & Paul Kurdyak, 2019. "Determining preventable acute care spending among high-cost patients in a single-payer public health care system," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 20(6), pages 869-878, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:eujhec:v:20:y:2019:i:6:d:10.1007_s10198-019-01051-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s10198-019-01051-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10198-019-01051-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10198-019-01051-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    High-cost patients; Preventable acute care; Administrative health care data; Algorithms;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I - Health, Education, and Welfare
    • I0 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - General
    • I1 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:eujhec:v:20:y:2019:i:6:d:10.1007_s10198-019-01051-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.