IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/envsyd/v44y2024i1d10.1007_s10669-023-09917-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What are stakeholder views and needs for achieving phosphorus sustainability?

Author

Listed:
  • Khara Grieger

    (North Carolina State University
    North Carolina State University
    Science and Technologies for Phosphorus Sustainability (STEPS) Center)

  • Ashton Merck

    (North Carolina State University
    North Carolina State University
    Science and Technologies for Phosphorus Sustainability (STEPS) Center)

  • Alison Deviney

    (North Carolina State University
    Science and Technologies for Phosphorus Sustainability (STEPS) Center)

  • Anna Marshall

    (North Carolina State University
    Science and Technologies for Phosphorus Sustainability (STEPS) Center
    University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign)

Abstract

Our society depends on the effective management of phosphorus (P). Phosphorus is a key component of agricultural fertilizers to improve crop yields, and also plays a critical role in many industrial processes and consumer products. In the past decade, there have been numerous calls for innovative approaches to manage P more sustainably, as it is a nonrenewable resource that can adversely impact aquatic ecosystems from runoff and inefficiencies in P use. To develop more sustainable solutions that will ultimately be adopted, diverse stakeholder perspectives must be recognized, including those in industry, government, academia, non-governmental organizations, and other civil groups. This study responds to this need by identifying stakeholder views, needs, concerns, and challenges regarding P sustainability. An online survey was developed and deployed to individuals identified as P sustainability experts and professionals in the U.S. and abroad. Based on responses from 96 stakeholder participants from a range of sectors, areas of expertise, and geographies, we found that the vast majority of stakeholders considered current P use to be unsustainable and were very concerned about the ability to manage P sustainably. Stakeholder participants did not distinguish between urgent and long-term challenges, and perceived financial and regulatory issues to be of greatest importance. Stakeholder participants expressed a range of needs to improve P management systems, including improved management practices, new technologies, enhanced regulations, and better approaches for engagement. Outcomes from this work can help inform future research, engagement, and policy priorities to ensure sustainable P management solutions based on stakeholder-identified perspectives and needs.

Suggested Citation

  • Khara Grieger & Ashton Merck & Alison Deviney & Anna Marshall, 2024. "What are stakeholder views and needs for achieving phosphorus sustainability?," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 44(1), pages 114-125, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:envsyd:v:44:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s10669-023-09917-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s10669-023-09917-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10669-023-09917-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10669-023-09917-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:envsyd:v:44:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s10669-023-09917-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.