IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/envsyd/v42y2022i1d10.1007_s10669-021-09830-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Extraction of mitigation-related text from Endangered Species Act documents using machine learning: a case study

Author

Listed:
  • Arun Varghese

    (ICF)

  • Kasey Allen

    (ICF)

  • George Agyeman-Badu

    (ICF)

  • Jennifer Haire

    (ICF)

  • Rebecca Madsen

    (Electric Power Resources Institute)

Abstract

Various industrial and development projects have the potential to adversely affect threatened and endangered species and their habitats. The federal Endangered Species Act (ESA) requires preparation of a biological assessment or habitat conservation plan before federal agencies can authorize, through decision documents and permits, unintentional and otherwise prohibited “take” (i.e., harm) of listed species. These documents describe the potential effects of proposed projects on listed species and include measures to mitigate those effects. Collectively, these assessments, plans, decision documents, and permits—termed ESA documents in our study—are valuable for identifying approved mitigation options that could apply to future projects. However, owing to the volume, length, and complexity of these documents, manual review would be time- and labor-intensive. In this study, we apply three supervised machine learning algorithms, including two based on state-of-the-art transfer learning, to develop and evaluate predictive models capable of extracting mitigation-related text from ESA documents. The machine learning models were developed based on a training dataset that was created as part of this study. The best performing model showed an estimated ROC-AUC score of 0.98 and a precision recall AUC score of 0.86 during cross-validation, indicating great potential for effectively extracting mitigation-related content from existing documents. To illustrate the utility of this technology, we present a simulated case study application in which the use of pretrained machine learning models capable of recognizing mitigation measures, coupled with a large historical corpus of ESA documents and keyword filters, provided a means to rapidly assess the commonly used mitigation measures for a given species. While this technology did not eliminate the requirement for biological expertise, it did allow for rapid scoping assessments and could serve as a supporting resource even for experienced biologists.

Suggested Citation

  • Arun Varghese & Kasey Allen & George Agyeman-Badu & Jennifer Haire & Rebecca Madsen, 2022. "Extraction of mitigation-related text from Endangered Species Act documents using machine learning: a case study," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 42(1), pages 63-74, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:envsyd:v:42:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s10669-021-09830-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s10669-021-09830-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10669-021-09830-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10669-021-09830-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Arun Varghese & Tao Hong & Chelsea Hunter & George Agyeman-Badu & Michelle Cawley, 2019. "Active learning in automated text classification: a case study exploring bias in predicted model performance metrics," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 39(3), pages 269-280, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zachary A. Collier & James H. Lambert & Igor Linkov, 2019. "Advances in machine learning and decision making," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 39(3), pages 247-248, September.
    2. Arun Varghese & George Agyeman-Badu & Michelle Cawley, 2020. "Deep learning in automated text classification: a case study using toxicological abstracts," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 40(4), pages 465-479, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:envsyd:v:42:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s10669-021-09830-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.