IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/endesu/v26y2024i1d10.1007_s10668-022-02735-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Climate change versus the water–energy–food nexus: the oldness or newness of the scientific issues as a factor in the deficit model and the hierarchy of response model

Author

Listed:
  • Qingjiang Yao

    (Lamar University)

  • Chiung-Fang Chang

    (Lamar University)

  • Praphul Joshi

    (Sam Houston State University)

  • Chelsea McDonald

    (Independent Researcher)

Abstract

Environmental issues need public support to be solved. But the theoretical model that supports providing the public scientific information to enhance their support for scientific issues, the deficit model, is confirmed in some studies but disapproved in others. Hypothesizing that the difference lies partially in the topic of issues used in those studies, this study tests the deficit model (and the expanded linkage from knowledge to attitude to behavioral intention in the hierarchy of response model) with the complex issue of climate change (N = 379), which is entangled with political and ideological confounders, and the new water–energy–food nexus (N = 524), which is involved with few confounders. The survey on climate change, a hotly debated issue deeply entangled with many social, economic, and political factors, revealed a substantial positive correlation between attitude and behavioral intention and no correlation between knowledge and attitude or behavioral intention, producing no evidence to support the deficit model and partial evidence to support the hierarchy of response model. The partial correlation analysis of this data, controlling age, gender, and ideology, also identified a negative relationship between knowledge and behavioral intention, further calling researchers’ attention to the influence of the complexness of the scientific event on public information processing. The survey on the WEF nexus, a new scientific approach that systematically governs water, energy, and food as a nexus, showed positive correlations of knowledge with attitude and of attitude with behavioral intention, confirming the deficit model as well as the traditional response hierarchy model. The study suggests that when confounding variables do not intervene, the deficit model and the traditional response model hold to guide science communication projects and garner public support for science and the environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Qingjiang Yao & Chiung-Fang Chang & Praphul Joshi & Chelsea McDonald, 2024. "Climate change versus the water–energy–food nexus: the oldness or newness of the scientific issues as a factor in the deficit model and the hierarchy of response model," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 823-840, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:26:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s10668-022-02735-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s10668-022-02735-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-022-02735-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10668-022-02735-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:26:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s10668-022-02735-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.