IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/endesu/v22y2020i2d10.1007_s10668-018-0262-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantitative assessment of ecological stress of construction lands by quantity and location: case study in Southern Jiangsu, Eastern China

Author

Listed:
  • Pingxing Li

    (Chinese Academy of Sciences
    Chinese Academy of Sciences
    Arizona State University)

  • Jinlong Gao

    (Chinese Academy of Sciences
    Chinese Academy of Sciences)

  • Jianglong Chen

    (Chinese Academy of Sciences
    Chinese Academy of Sciences)

Abstract

China has rapidly expanded economically and spatially in recent years; the booming construction industry necessary to support this growth has significantly impacted the country’s ecological future. This study was conducted to determine the ecological stress of construction lands in terms of quantity and spatial locations under the landscape ecology concepts of “Quantity-Oriented Ecological Stress” (QOES) and “Location-Oriented Ecological Stress” (LOES). We first provide a brief introduction of the study area (Southern Jiangsu, Eastern China) followed by a discussion of the methodology and data processing techniques applied. We next examine the spatial heterogeneity of ecological suitability (ES) from the perspective of ecological process analysis and divide Southern Jiangsu into five ecological zones with different ES levels. We then classify construction lands based on their spatial distribution in different ecological zones. We calculated county-level LOES and compared it against QOES; we also discuss our research contributions and policy implications in regard to the spatial allocation of construction lands. The locations of construction lands are of significance to ecological safety, and location effects correspond to the spatial heterogeneity of regional ecosystems. A location-oriented evaluation more objectively reflects the ecological stress of construction lands expansion than a quantity-oriented evaluation. Optimizing land development practices serves not only to control the quantity of construction lands but also the construction lands concession and ecological restoration in areas with high ES.

Suggested Citation

  • Pingxing Li & Jinlong Gao & Jianglong Chen, 2020. "Quantitative assessment of ecological stress of construction lands by quantity and location: case study in Southern Jiangsu, Eastern China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 1559-1578, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:22:y:2020:i:2:d:10.1007_s10668-018-0262-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s10668-018-0262-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-018-0262-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10668-018-0262-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Li, Feng & Ye, Yaping & Song, Bowen & Wang, Rusong, 2015. "Evaluation of urban suitable ecological land based on the minimum cumulative resistance model: A case study from Changzhou, China," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 318(C), pages 194-203.
    2. Michael P Johnson, 2001. "Environmental Impacts of Urban Sprawl: A Survey of the Literature and Proposed Research Agenda," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 33(4), pages 717-735, April.
    3. Gao, Jinlong & Chen, Wen & Yuan, Feng, 2017. "Spatial restructuring and the logic of industrial land redevelopment in urban China: I. Theoretical considerations," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 604-613.
    4. Song, Wei & Deng, Xiangzheng & Yuan, Yongwei & Wang, Zhan & Li, Zhaohua, 2015. "Impacts of land-use change on valued ecosystem service in rapidly urbanized North China Plain," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 318(C), pages 245-253.
    5. Xiangzheng Deng & Jikun Huang & Scott Rozelle & Emi Uchida, 2010. "Economic Growth and the Expansion of Urban Land in China," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 47(4), pages 813-843, April.
    6. Sun, Xiang & Xiong, Shu & Zhu, Xiaojing & Zhu, Xiaodong & Li, Yangfan & Li, B. Larry, 2015. "A new indices system for evaluating ecological-economic-social performances of wetland restorations and its application to Taihu Lake Basin, China," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 295(C), pages 216-226.
    7. Yousef Sakieh & Bahman Amiri & Afshin Danekar & Jahangir Feghhi & Sadeq Dezhkam, 2015. "Scenario-based evaluation of urban development sustainability: an integrative modeling approach to compromise between urbanization suitability index and landscape pattern," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 17(6), pages 1343-1365, December.
    8. Rodriguez Gonzalez, Jesus & del Barrio, Gabriel & Duguy, Beatriz, 2008. "Assessing functional landscape connectivity for disturbance propagation on regional scales—A cost-surface model approach applied to surface fire spread," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 211(1), pages 121-141.
    9. Dupras, Jerôme & Marull, Joan & Parcerisas, Lluís & Coll, Francesc & Gonzalez, Andrew & Girard, Marc & Tello, Enric, 2016. "The impacts of urban sprawl on ecological connectivity in the Montreal Metropolitan Region," Environmental Science & Policy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 61-73.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jinlong Gao & Zhixuan Wu & Jianglong Chen & Wen Chen, 2020. "Beyond the bid‐rent: Two tales of land use transition in contemporary China," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(3), pages 1336-1356, September.
    2. Binglu Wu & Di Mu & Yi Luo & Zhengguang Xiao & Jilong Zhao & Dongxu Cui, 2022. "Rural Ecological Problems in China from 2013 to 2022: A Review of Research Hotspots, Geographical Distribution, and Countermeasures," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-22, August.
    3. Hongyu Du & Fengqi Zhou, 2023. "Study on the Layout of Ecological Space and the Integrated Management Mechanism of the Yangtze River Delta Urban Agglomeration," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-15, January.
    4. Tao Peng & Hongwei Deng, 2021. "Study on the division of main functional regions based on relative carrying capacity of resources: a case study of Guiyang, southwest China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(6), pages 9493-9513, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fernando Rubiera-Morollón & Ruben Garrido-Yserte, 2020. "Recent Literature about Urban Sprawl: A Renewed Relevance of the Phenomenon from the Perspective of Environmental Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-14, August.
    2. Walid Oueslati & Seraphim Alvanides & Guy Garrod, 2015. "Determinants of urban sprawl in European cities," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 52(9), pages 1594-1614, July.
    3. Xiaodong Yang & Jianlong Wang & Jianhong Cao & Siyu Ren & Qiying Ran & Haitao Wu, 2022. "The spatial spillover effect of urban sprawl and fiscal decentralization on air pollution: evidence from 269 cities in China," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 63(2), pages 847-875, August.
    4. Guoxiang Li & Keqiang Wang & Hongmei Liu, 2021. "Construction land reduction, rural financial development, and industrial structure optimization," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(3), pages 1783-1803, September.
    5. Xiaoqing Lin & Chunyan Lu & Kaishan Song & Ying Su & Yifan Lei & Lianxiu Zhong & Yibin Gao, 2020. "Analysis of Coupling Coordination Variance between Urbanization Quality and Eco-Environment Pressure: A Case Study of the West Taiwan Strait Urban Agglomeration, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-19, March.
    6. Yuejuan Yang & Kun Wang & Di Liu & Xinquan Zhao & Jiangwen Fan & Jinsheng Li & Xiajie Zhai & Cong Zhang & Ruyi Zhan, 2019. "Spatiotemporal Variation Characteristics of Ecosystem Service Losses in the Agro-Pastoral Ecotone of Northern China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-23, April.
    7. Han, Wenjing & Zhang, Xiaoling & Zheng, Xian, 2020. "Land use regulation and urban land value: Evidence from China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    8. Peter Bäckström & Erika Sandow & Olle Westerlund, 2016. "Commuting and timing of retirement," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 56(1), pages 125-152, January.
    9. Thomas Bolognesi, 2015. "The water vulnerability of metro and megacities: An investigation of structural determinants," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 39(2), pages 123-133, May.
    10. Yaoyao Zhu & Gabriel Hoh Teck Ling, 2022. "A Systematic Review of Morphological Transformation of Urban Open Spaces: Drivers, Trends, and Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-22, August.
    11. Bingkui Qiu & Shasha Lu & Min Zhou & Lu Zhang & Yu Deng & Ci Song & Zuo Zhang, 2015. "A Hybrid Inexact Optimization Method for Land-Use Allocation in Association with Environmental/Ecological Requirements at a Watershed Level," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-25, April.
    12. Shannon Rogers & Semra Aytur & Kevin Gardner & Cynthia Carlson, 2012. "Measuring community sustainability: exploring the intersection of the built environment & social capital with a participatory case study," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 2(2), pages 143-153, June.
    13. Tang, Peng & Feng, Yue & Li, Min & Zhang, Yanyan, 2021. "Can the performance evaluation change from central government suppress illegal land use in local governments? A new interpretation of Chinese decentralisation," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    14. Daniela Smiraglia & Luca Salvati & Gianluca Egidi & Rosanna Salvia & Antonio Giménez-Morera & Rares Halbac-Cotoara-Zamfir, 2021. "Toward a New Urban Cycle? A Closer Look to Sprawl, Demographic Transitions and the Environment in Europe," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-14, January.
    15. Le, Minh Khue & Zhu, Jieming & Nguyen, Hoang Linh, 2022. "Land redevelopment under ambiguous property rights in transitional Vietnam: A case of spatial transformation in Hanoi city center," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    16. Yuting, Yang & Guanghui, Jiang & Qiuyue, Zheng & Dingyang, Zhou & Yuling, Li, 2019. "Does the land use structure change conform to the evolution law of industrial structure? An empirical study of Anhui Province, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 657-667.
    17. ChuangLin Fang & XingLiang Guan & ShaSha Lu & Min Zhou & Yu Deng, 2013. "Input–Output Efficiency of Urban Agglomerations in China: An Application of Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA)," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 50(13), pages 2766-2790, October.
    18. Hsing-Fu Kuo & Ko-Wan Tsou, 2017. "Modeling and Simulation of the Future Impacts of Urban Land Use Change on the Natural Environment by SLEUTH and Cluster Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-21, December.
    19. Maggie MacKinnon & Maibritt Pedersen Zari & Daniel K. Brown, 2023. "Improving Urban Habitat Connectivity for Native Birds: Using Least-Cost Path Analyses to Design Urban Green Infrastructure Networks," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-21, July.
    20. Siyi Chen & Zhigang Chen & Yan Shen, 2021. "Can improving law enforcement effectively curb illegal land use in China?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(2), pages 1-17, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:22:y:2020:i:2:d:10.1007_s10668-018-0262-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.