IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/empeco/v66y2024i5d10.1007_s00181-023-02515-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Benchmarking econometric and machine learning methodologies in nowcasting GDP

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Hopp

    (UNCTAD)

Abstract

Nowcasting can play a key role in giving policymakers timelier insight to data published with a significant time lag, such as final GDP figures. Currently, there are a plethora of methodologies and approaches for practitioners to choose from. However, there lacks a comprehensive comparison of these disparate approaches in terms of predictive performance and characteristics. This paper addresses that deficiency by examining the performance of 17 different methodologies in nowcasting US quarterly GDP growth, including all the methods most commonly employed in nowcasting, as well as some of the most popular traditional machine learning approaches. Performance was assessed over a 20-year period, from 2002 to 2022. This span encompassed two crises, the 2008 financial crisis and the COVID crisis, as well as extended tranquil periods. The two best-performing methodologies in the analysis were long short-term memory artificial neural networks (LSTM) and Bayesian vector autoregression (Bayesian VAR). To facilitate further application and testing of each of the examined methodologies, an open-source repository containing boilerplate code that can be applied to different datasets is published alongside the paper, available at: github.com/dhopp1/nowcasting_benchmark

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Hopp, 2024. "Benchmarking econometric and machine learning methodologies in nowcasting GDP," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 66(5), pages 2191-2247, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:empeco:v:66:y:2024:i:5:d:10.1007_s00181-023-02515-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s00181-023-02515-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00181-023-02515-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00181-023-02515-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:empeco:v:66:y:2024:i:5:d:10.1007_s00181-023-02515-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.