IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/drugsa/v42y2019i9d10.1007_s40264-019-00844-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prevalence, Safety and Long-Term Retention Rates of Biologics in Hong Kong from 2001 to 2015

Author

Listed:
  • Mengqin Ge

    (The University of Hong Kong)

  • Kenneth K. Man

    (The University of Hong Kong
    UCL School of Pharmacy
    Erasmus University Medical Centre)

  • Celine S. Chui

    (The University of Hong Kong
    The University of Hong Kong)

  • Esther W. Chan

    (The University of Hong Kong
    The University of Hong Kong Shenzhen Hospital)

  • Ian C. Wong

    (The University of Hong Kong
    UCL School of Pharmacy
    The University of Hong Kong Shenzhen Hospital)

  • Xue Li

    (The University of Hong Kong)

Abstract

Background Biologic agents were initially introduced as treatment for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) but have since been used for other medical conditions. As new biologics become increasingly widespread in treatment regimens, it is important to understand their safety and utilization in the post-marketing context. Purpose The aim of this study was to investigate long-term prescribing patterns and the safety of biologics in real clinical settings in Hong Kong. Methods This was a population-based drug utilization study in Hong Kong using a territory-wide electronic medical database Clinical Data Analysis and Reporting System (CDARS). Patients who received biologic treatments from 2001 to 2015 were identified and their corresponding demographic and clinical details retrieved from CDARS. The annual prevalence of biologic prescriptions, the long-term retention rates and incidence rates of infections associated with biologic treatments were evaluated. Results A total of 30,298 patients (male: 44%) prescribed biologic treatments were identified from CDARS from 2001 to 2015. The annual prevalence of biologic prescriptions increased from 0.1 to 16.1 per 100 persons for both sexes. Infliximab had the highest first-year retention rate of 95.6% among all biologics and continuously attained the highest retention rate from second to fifth year. The overall incidence rate of serious infections was less than five per 100 person-years. Specifically, the incidence rates of tuberculosis, upper and lower respiratory infections and herpes zoster were 0.52, 3.24, 4.99 and 1.01 per 100 person-years, respectively. Conclusion This population-based study revealed an increasing prevalence of biologic prescribing. Results from the study described the long-term retention rates and incidence rates of serious infections of biologic treatments for all indications, and confirmed the safety of biologic treatments. Since this study provides an overview of all biologic utilization, further studies on cost effectiveness, safety and compliance of treatment in different patient groups are still warranted.

Suggested Citation

  • Mengqin Ge & Kenneth K. Man & Celine S. Chui & Esther W. Chan & Ian C. Wong & Xue Li, 2019. "Prevalence, Safety and Long-Term Retention Rates of Biologics in Hong Kong from 2001 to 2015," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 42(9), pages 1091-1102, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:42:y:2019:i:9:d:10.1007_s40264-019-00844-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s40264-019-00844-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40264-019-00844-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40264-019-00844-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:42:y:2019:i:9:d:10.1007_s40264-019-00844-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/40264 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.