IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/decisn/v50y2023i4d10.1007_s40622-023-00371-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of individual short-term memory capacity on choice overload effect: Is there stimulus specificity?

Author

Listed:
  • Chenyu Lv

    (Southwest University)

  • Ofir Turel

    (The University of Melbourne)

  • Qinghua He

    (Southwest University
    Southwest University
    Beijing Normal University)

Abstract

Too many choices result in choice overload, the effects of which are generally negative. The capacity of short-term memory also impacts the ability and efficiency of people to process multiple options or information, thus affecting the experience of choice. Using three different stimuli for measuring short-term memory capacity and an actual choice task, we provide converging evidence that short-term memory has a moderating effect on the choice overload effect (which is more likely to occur in individuals with poor short-term memory ability), but it is important to note that this moderation is stimulus-specific. That is to say, the choice overload effect of individuals in the picture choosing task is impacted solely by their short-term memory capacity of pictures, and has nothing to do with other stimulus types. It can help consumers and businesses better process the way information is presented to maximize short-term memory and reduce the occurrence of choice overload effect.

Suggested Citation

  • Chenyu Lv & Ofir Turel & Qinghua He, 2023. "The impact of individual short-term memory capacity on choice overload effect: Is there stimulus specificity?," DECISION: Official Journal of the Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, Springer;Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, vol. 50(4), pages 403-414, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:decisn:v:50:y:2023:i:4:d:10.1007_s40622-023-00371-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s40622-023-00371-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40622-023-00371-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40622-023-00371-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:decisn:v:50:y:2023:i:4:d:10.1007_s40622-023-00371-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.