IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/coopap/v85y2023i2d10.1007_s10589-023-00462-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Globally optimal univariate spline approximations

Author

Listed:
  • Robert Mohr

    (Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT))

  • Maximilian Coblenz

    (Ludwigshafen University of Business and Society)

  • Peter Kirst

    (Wageningen University and Research (WUR))

Abstract

We revisit the problem of computing optimal spline approximations for univariate least-squares splines from a combinatorial optimization perspective. In contrast to most approaches from the literature we aim at globally optimal coefficients as well as a globally optimal placement of a fixed number of knots for a discrete variant of this problem. To achieve this, two different possibilities are developed. The first approach that we present is the formulation of the problem as a mixed-integer quadratically constrained problem, which can be solved using commercial optimization solvers. The second method that we propose is a branch-and-bound algorithm tailored specifically to the combinatorial formulation. We compare our algorithmic approaches empirically on both, real and synthetic curve fitting data sets from the literature. The numerical experiments show that our approach to tackle the least-squares spline approximation problem with free knots is able to compute solutions to problems of realistic sizes within reasonable computing times.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert Mohr & Maximilian Coblenz & Peter Kirst, 2023. "Globally optimal univariate spline approximations," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 85(2), pages 409-439, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:coopap:v:85:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1007_s10589-023-00462-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s10589-023-00462-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10589-023-00462-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10589-023-00462-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. M. P. Wand, 2000. "A Comparison of Regression Spline Smoothing Procedures," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 443-462, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cao, Jiguo & Ramsay, James O., 2009. "Generalized profiling estimation for global and adaptive penalized spline smoothing," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(7), pages 2550-2562, May.
    2. Yaeji Lim & Hee-Seok Oh & Ying Kuen Cheung, 2019. "Multiscale Clustering for Functional Data," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 36(2), pages 368-391, July.
    3. Ciprian Crainiceanu & David Ruppert & Raymond Carroll, 2004. "Spatially Adaptive Bayesian P-Splines with Heteroscedastic Errors," Johns Hopkins University Dept. of Biostatistics Working Paper Series 1061, Berkeley Electronic Press.
    4. Carlos E. Melo & Oscar O. Melo & Jorge Mateu, 2018. "A distance-based model for spatial prediction using radial basis functions," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 102(2), pages 263-288, April.
    5. Yu Yue & Paul Speckman & Dongchu Sun, 2012. "Priors for Bayesian adaptive spline smoothing," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 64(3), pages 577-613, June.
    6. Jang, Dongik & Oh, Hee-Seok, 2011. "Enhancement of spatially adaptive smoothing splines via parameterization of smoothing parameters," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(2), pages 1029-1040, February.
    7. Gerhard Tutz & Harald Binder, 2006. "Generalized Additive Modeling with Implicit Variable Selection by Likelihood-Based Boosting," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 62(4), pages 961-971, December.
    8. Kagerer, Kathrin, 2013. "A short introduction to splines in least squares regression analysis," University of Regensburg Working Papers in Business, Economics and Management Information Systems 472, University of Regensburg, Department of Economics.
    9. Gerhard Tutz, 2022. "Item Response Thresholds Models: A General Class of Models for Varying Types of Items," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 87(4), pages 1238-1269, December.
    10. Men, Tianli & Li, Yan-Fu & Ji, Yujun & Zhang, Xinliang & Liu, Pengfei, 2022. "Health assessment of high-speed train wheels based on group-profile data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    11. Leitenstorfer, Florian & Tutz, Gerhard, 2007. "Knot selection by boosting techniques," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(9), pages 4605-4621, May.
    12. Nielsen, J.D. & Dean, C.B., 2008. "Adaptive functional mixed NHPP models for the analysis of recurrent event panel data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(7), pages 3670-3685, March.
    13. Lee, Thomas C. M., 2003. "Smoothing parameter selection for smoothing splines: a simulation study," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 42(1-2), pages 139-148, February.
    14. Soumya D. Mohanty & Ethan Fahnestock, 2021. "Adaptive spline fitting with particle swarm optimization," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 36(1), pages 155-191, March.
    15. Hervé Cardot, 2002. "Local roughness penalties for regression splines," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 89-102, March.
    16. Annie Qu & Runze Li, 2006. "Quadratic Inference Functions for Varying-Coefficient Models with Longitudinal Data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 62(2), pages 379-391, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:coopap:v:85:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1007_s10589-023-00462-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.