IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/ariqol/v15y2020i2d10.1007_s11482-018-9696-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Psychometric Characteristics of the German Values in Action Inventory of Strengths 120-Item Short Form

Author

Listed:
  • Stefan Höfer

    (Medical University of Innsbruck)

  • Melanie Hausler

    (Medical University of Innsbruck)

  • Alexandra Huber

    (Medical University of Innsbruck)

  • Cornelia Strecker

    (University of Innsbruck)

  • Daniela Renn
  • Thomas Höge

    (University of Innsbruck)

Abstract

The original Values in Action Inventory of Strengths (VIA-IS) is an international 240 item validated self-report questionnaire measuring character strengths. A validated and reliable English 120-item short form (VIA-120) is available. However, there is limited information about the psychometric properties of the German VIA-120. This article addresses this gap and reports the reliability, validity and comparability of the German VIA-120 with the German VIA-240 version. Two independent samples were recruited: a general population sample (N = 1073, Sample 1) and a sample consisting of medical students and physicians (N = 685, Sample 2). Internal consistency of the VIA-120-scales ranged from α = .58 (modesty) to α = .87 (spirituality) in Sample 1 and α = .63 (honesty) to α = .90 (spirituality) in Sample 2. Intercorrelations between the scales of the 120-item version and the original 240-Items version (Sample 1) ranged from r = .52 (hope) to r = .89 (prudence). Criterion validity with the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS) and the Brief Inventory of Thriving (BIT) was demonstrated. The comparison of the factor structure between the original and the short form showed a good convergence (Tucker’s Phi .93–.99 Sample 1, .95–.98 Sample 2). Overall, the German VIA-120 was reliable, showed good convergence with the German VIA-240 and thus presents a similar level of validity for the assessment of character strengths. This study provides the first indication that the VIA 120 short form is comparable regarding the validity and reliability of the original VIA 240-item version indicating its potential to be used in large scale research studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Stefan Höfer & Melanie Hausler & Alexandra Huber & Cornelia Strecker & Daniela Renn & Thomas Höge, 2020. "Psychometric Characteristics of the German Values in Action Inventory of Strengths 120-Item Short Form," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 15(2), pages 597-611, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:ariqol:v:15:y:2020:i:2:d:10.1007_s11482-018-9696-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s11482-018-9696-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11482-018-9696-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11482-018-9696-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. E. Cureton, 1966. "Corrected item-test correlations," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 31(1), pages 93-96, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Christian WEISMAYER, 2022. "Applied Research in Quality of Life: A Computational Literature Review," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 17(3), pages 1433-1458, June.
    2. Young-Jin Lim, 2023. "Psychometric Properties of the Brief Strengths Scale-12 in Korean Population," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. A. D. Slepkov & M. L. Van Bussel & K. M. Fitze & W. S. Burr, 2021. "A Baseline for Multiple-Choice Testing in the University Classroom," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(2), pages 21582440211, May.
    2. Jari Metsämuuronen, 2012. "Challenges of the Fennema-Sherman Test in the International Comparisons," International Journal of Psychological Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 4(3), pages 1-1, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:ariqol:v:15:y:2020:i:2:d:10.1007_s11482-018-9696-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.