IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/aphecp/v9y2011i4p259-273.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cost effectiveness of secondary vs tertiary prevention for post-menopausal osteoporosis

Author

Listed:
  • Dirk Mueller
  • Afschin Gandjour

Abstract

Compared with TP, a strategy based on SP/TP appears to be more expensive but more effective in each age group. Given that cost effectiveness seems acceptable, allocation of resources to SP/TP to decrease post-menopausal osteoporotic fracture risk may be justified. Copyright Adis Data Information BV 2011

Suggested Citation

  • Dirk Mueller & Afschin Gandjour, 2011. "Cost effectiveness of secondary vs tertiary prevention for post-menopausal osteoporosis," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 9(4), pages 259-273, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:aphecp:v:9:y:2011:i:4:p:259-273
    DOI: 10.2165/11587360-000000000-00000
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2165/11587360-000000000-00000
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2165/11587360-000000000-00000?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Afschin Gandjour & Eva-Julia Weyler, 2006. "Cost-effectiveness of referrals to high-volume hospitals: An analysis based on a probabilistic Markov model for hip fracture surgeries," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 9(4), pages 359-369, November.
    2. Lee R. Mobley & Thomas J. Hoerger & John S. Wittenborn & Deborah A. Galuska & Jaya K. Rao, 2006. "Cost-Effectiveness of Osteoporosis Screening and Treatment with Hormone Replacement Therapy, Raloxifene, or Alendronate," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 26(2), pages 194-206, March.
    3. Gandjour, Afschin & Stock, Stephanie, 2007. "A national hypertension treatment program in Germany and its estimated impact on costs, life expectancy, and cost-effectiveness," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(2-3), pages 257-267, October.
    4. Dirk Mueller & Eva Weyler & Afschin Gandjour, 2008. "Cost Effectiveness of the German Screen-and-Treat Strategy for Postmenopausal Osteoporosis," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 26(6), pages 513-536, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dirk Mueller & Afschin Gandjour, 2008. "Cost effectiveness of ultrasound and bone densitometry for osteoporosis screening in post-menopausal women," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 6(2), pages 113-135, July.
    2. Dirk Mueller & Eva Weyler & Afschin Gandjour, 2008. "Cost Effectiveness of the German Screen-and-Treat Strategy for Postmenopausal Osteoporosis," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 26(6), pages 513-536, June.
    3. Eberhard Wille & Jürgen Scholze & Eduardo Alegria & Claudio Ferri & Sue Langham & Warren Stevens & David Jeffries & Kerstin Uhl-Hochgraeber, 2011. "Modelling the costs of care of hypertension in patients with metabolic syndrome and its consequences, in Germany, Spain and Italy," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 12(3), pages 205-218, June.
    4. Robert L. Herrick & Steven G. Buchberger & Robert M. Clark & Margaret Kupferle & Regan Murray & Paul Succop, 2012. "A Markov Model To Estimate Salmonella Morbidity, Mortality, Illness Duration, And Cost," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 21(10), pages 1169-1182, October.
    5. Daniel M. Sugrue & Thomas Ward & Sukhvir Rai & Phil McEwan & Heleen G. M. Haalen, 2019. "Economic Modelling of Chronic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Literature Review to Inform Conceptual Model Design," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 37(12), pages 1451-1468, December.
    6. Rachel A. Elliott & Lukasz Tanajewski & Georgios Gkountouras & Anthony J. Avery & Nick Barber & Rajnikant Mehta & Matthew J. Boyd & Asam Latif & Antony Chuter & Justin Waring, 2017. "Cost Effectiveness of Support for People Starting a New Medication for a Long-Term Condition Through Community Pharmacies: An Economic Evaluation of the New Medicine Service (NMS) Compared with Normal," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 35(12), pages 1237-1255, December.
    7. Rachael Fleurence & Cynthia Iglesias & Jeanene Johnson, 2007. "The Cost Effectiveness of Bisphosphonates for the Prevention and Treatment of Osteoporosis," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 25(11), pages 913-933, November.
    8. Afschin Gandjour, 2010. "A model to predict the cost‐effectiveness of disease management programs," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 19(6), pages 697-715, June.
    9. Kurt Lippuner & Richard Pollock & Jayne Smith-Palmer & Thomas Meury & William Valentine, 2011. "A review of the cost effectiveness of bisphosphonates in the treatment of post-menopausal osteoporosis in Switzerland," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 9(6), pages 403-417, November.
    10. Douglas Wolf & Thomas Gill, 2009. "Modeling transition rates using panel current-status data: How serious is the bias?," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 46(2), pages 371-386, May.
    11. Smita Nayak & Mark S Roberts & Susan L Greenspan, 2012. "Impact of Generic Alendronate Cost on the Cost-Effectiveness of Osteoporosis Screening and Treatment," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(3), pages 1-7, March.
    12. Björn Stollenwerk & Afschin Gandjour & Markus Lüngen & Uwe Siebert, 2013. "Accounting for increased non-target-disease-specific mortality in decision-analytic screening models for economic evaluation," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 14(6), pages 1035-1048, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:aphecp:v:9:y:2011:i:4:p:259-273. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.