IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/aphecp/v16y2018i2d10.1007_s40258-017-0368-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A National Budget Impact Analysis of a Specialised Surveillance Programme for Individuals at Very High Risk of Melanoma in Australia

Author

Listed:
  • Caroline G. Watts

    (The University of Sydney
    Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney)

  • Sally Wortley

    (The University of Sydney
    Menzies Centre for Health Policy, The University of Sydney)

  • Sarah Norris

    (Menzies Centre for Health Policy, The University of Sydney)

  • Scott W. Menzies

    (Sydney Melanoma Diagnostic Centre, Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital
    Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, The University of Sydney)

  • Pascale Guitera

    (Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney
    Sydney Melanoma Diagnostic Centre, Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital)

  • Lisa Askie

    (The University of Sydney)

  • Graham J. Mann

    (Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney
    Westmead Institute for Medical Research, The University of Sydney)

  • Rachael L. Morton

    (Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney
    The University of Sydney)

  • Anne E. Cust

    (The University of Sydney
    Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney)

Abstract

Background Specialised surveillance using total body photography and digital dermoscopy to monitor people at very high risk of developing a second or subsequent melanoma has been reported as cost effective. Objectives We aimed to estimate the 5-year healthcare budget impact of providing specialised surveillance for people at very high risk of subsequent melanoma from the perspective of the Australian healthcare system. Methods A budget impact model was constructed to assess the costs of monitoring and potential savings compared with current routine care based on identification of patients at the time of a melanoma diagnosis. We used data from a published cost-effectiveness analysis of specialised surveillance, and Cancer Registry data, to estimate the patient population and healthcare costs for 2017–2021. Results When all eligible patients, estimated at 18% of patients with melanoma diagnosed annually in Australia, received specialised surveillance rather than routine care, the cumulative 5-year cost was estimated at $93.5 million Australian dollars ($AU) ($US 64 million) for specialised surveillance compared with $AU 120.7 million ($US 82.7 million) for routine care, delivering savings of $AU 27.2 million ($US 18.6 million). With a staggered introduction of 60% of eligible patients accessing surveillance in year 1, increasing to 90% in years 4 and 5, the cumulative cost over 5 years was estimated at $AU 98.1 million ($US 67.2 million), amounting to savings of $AU 22.6 million ($US 15.5 million) compared with routine care. Conclusions Specialised melanoma surveillance is likely to provide substantial cost savings for the Australian healthcare system.

Suggested Citation

  • Caroline G. Watts & Sally Wortley & Sarah Norris & Scott W. Menzies & Pascale Guitera & Lisa Askie & Graham J. Mann & Rachael L. Morton & Anne E. Cust, 2018. "A National Budget Impact Analysis of a Specialised Surveillance Programme for Individuals at Very High Risk of Melanoma in Australia," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 235-242, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:aphecp:v:16:y:2018:i:2:d:10.1007_s40258-017-0368-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s40258-017-0368-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40258-017-0368-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40258-017-0368-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thomas M. Elliott & David C. Whiteman & Catherine M. Olsen & Louisa G. Gordon, 2017. "Estimated Healthcare Costs of Melanoma in Australia Over 3 Years Post-Diagnosis," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 15(6), pages 805-816, December.
    2. Thomas M. Elliott & David C. Whiteman & Catherine M. Olsen & Louisa G. Gordon, 2017. "Erratum to: Estimated Healthcare Costs of Melanoma in Australia Over 3 Years Post-Diagnosis," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 15(6), pages 817-818, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mara Giavina-Bianchi & Raquel Machado de Sousa & Vitor Zago de Almeida Paciello & William Gois Vitor & Aline Lissa Okita & Renata Prôa & Gian Lucca dos Santos Severino & Anderson Alves Schinaid & Rafa, 2021. "Implementation of artificial intelligence algorithms for melanoma screening in a primary care setting," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(9), pages 1-13, September.
    2. Mbathio Dieng & Robin M. Turner & Sarah J. Lord & Andrew J. Einstein & Alexander M. Menzies & Robyn P. M. Saw & Omgo E. Nieweg & John F. Thompson & Rachael L. Morton, 2022. "Cost-Effectiveness of PET/CT Surveillance Schedules to Detect Distant Recurrence of Resected Stage III Melanoma," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-13, February.
    3. Louisa G. Gordon & William Leung & Richard Johns & Bronwen McNoe & Daniel Lindsay & Katharina M. D. Merollini & Thomas M. Elliott & Rachel E. Neale & Catherine M. Olsen & Nirmala Pandeya & David C. Wh, 2022. "Estimated Healthcare Costs of Melanoma and Keratinocyte Skin Cancers in Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand in 2021," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-14, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:aphecp:v:16:y:2018:i:2:d:10.1007_s40258-017-0368-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.