IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/aphecp/v11y2013i3p155-161.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Resource-Use Measurement Based on Patient Recall: Issues and Challenges for Economic Evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • Joanna Thorn
  • Joanna Coast
  • David Cohen
  • William Hollingworth
  • Martin Knapp
  • Sian Noble
  • Colin Ridyard
  • Sarah Wordsworth
  • Dyfrig Hughes

Abstract

Accurate resource-use measurement is challenging within an economic evaluation, but is a fundamental requirement for estimating efficiency. Considerable research effort has been concentrated on the appropriate measurement of outcomes and the policy implications of economic evaluation, while methods for resource-use measurement have been relatively neglected. Recently, the Database of Instruments for Resource Use Measurement (DIRUM) was set up at http://www.dirum.org to provide a repository where researchers can share resource-use measures and methods. A workshop to discuss the issues was held at the University of Birmingham in October 2011. Based on material presented at the workshop, this article highlights the state of the art of UK instruments for resource-use data collection based on patient recall. We consider methodological issues in the design and analysis of resource-use instruments, and the challenges associated with designing new questionnaires. We suggest a method of developing a good practice guideline, and identify some areas for future research. Consensus amongst health economists has yet to be reached on many aspects of resource-use measurement. We argue that researchers should now afford costing methodologies the same attention as outcome measurement, and we hope that this Current Opinion article will stimulate a debate on methods of resource-use data collection and establish a research agenda to improve the precision and accuracy of resource-use estimates. Copyright Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2013

Suggested Citation

  • Joanna Thorn & Joanna Coast & David Cohen & William Hollingworth & Martin Knapp & Sian Noble & Colin Ridyard & Sarah Wordsworth & Dyfrig Hughes, 2013. "Resource-Use Measurement Based on Patient Recall: Issues and Challenges for Economic Evaluation," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 11(3), pages 155-161, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:aphecp:v:11:y:2013:i:3:p:155-161
    DOI: 10.1007/s40258-013-0022-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s40258-013-0022-4
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40258-013-0022-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Irina Pokhilenko & Luca M. M. Janssen & Aggie T. G. Paulus & Ruben M. W. A. Drost & William Hollingworth & Joanna C. Thorn & Sian Noble & Judit Simon & Claudia Fischer & Susanne Mayer & Luis Salvador-, 2023. "Development of an Instrument for the Assessment of Health-Related Multi-sectoral Resource Use in Europe: The PECUNIA RUM," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 155-166, March.
    2. Joanna Thorn & Emma Turner & Luke Hounsome & Eleanor Walsh & Jenny Donovan & Julia Verne & David Neal & Freddie Hamdy & Richard Martin & Sian Noble, 2016. "Validation of the Hospital Episode Statistics Outpatient Dataset in England," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 34(2), pages 161-168, February.
    3. Matthew Franklin & Sarah Davis & Michelle Horspool & Wei Sun Kua & Steven Julious, 2017. "Economic Evaluations Alongside Efficient Study Designs Using Large Observational Datasets: the PLEASANT Trial Case Study," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 35(5), pages 561-573, May.
    4. Praveen Thokala & Simon Dixon & Beate Jahn, 2015. "Resource Modelling: The Missing Piece of the HTA Jigsaw?," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 33(3), pages 193-203, March.
    5. Colin H. Ridyard & Dyfrig A. Hughes & DIRUM Team, 2015. "Taxonomy for Methods of Resource Use Measurement," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 24(3), pages 372-378, March.
    6. Susanne Mayer & Aggie T. G. Paulus & Agata Łaszewska & Judit Simon & Ruben M. W. A. Drost & Dirk Ruwaard & Silvia M. A. A. Evers, 2017. "Health-Related Resource-Use Measurement Instruments for Intersectoral Costs and Benefits in the Education and Criminal Justice Sectors," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 35(9), pages 895-908, September.
    7. Matthew Franklin & James Lomas & Simon Walker & Tracey Young, 2019. "An Educational Review About Using Cost Data for the Purpose of Cost-Effectiveness Analysis," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 37(5), pages 631-643, May.
    8. Joanna C. Thorn & Emma Turner & Luke Hounsome & Eleanor Walsh & Jenny L. Donovan & Julia Verne & David E. Neal & Freddie C. Hamdy & Richard M. Martin & Sian M. Noble, 2016. "Validation of the Hospital Episode Statistics Outpatient Dataset in England," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 34(2), pages 161-168, February.
    9. Pokhilenko, Irina & Janssen, Luca M.M. & Paulus, Aggie T.G. & Drost, Ruben M.W.A. & Hollingworth, William & Thorn, Joanna & Noble, Sian & Simon, Judit & Fischer, Claudia & Mayer, Susanne & Salvador-Ca, 2023. "Development of an instrument for the assessment of health-related multi-sectoral resource use in Europe: the PECUNIA RUM," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 117961, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    10. Kim Dalziel & Jinhu Li & Anthony Scott & Philip Clarke, 2018. "Accuracy of patient recall for self‐reported doctor visits: Is shorter recall better?," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(11), pages 1684-1698, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:aphecp:v:11:y:2013:i:3:p:155-161. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.