IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/aphecp/v11y2013i1p53-63.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing the Cost Utility of Response-Guided Therapy in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C Genotype 1 in the UK Using the MONARCH Model

Author

Listed:
  • Phil McEwan
  • Ray Kim
  • Yong Yuan

Abstract

This analysis suggests that the treatment of HCV genotype 1 patients in fibrosis stage F2 has the greatest potential for maximizing health benefit and cost saving within an RGT protocol. Predicting those patients most likely to respond to treatments is important from both a clinical and cost perspective and the tailoring of treatment duration with the current standard of care is likely to remain a priority for payers with budgetary constraints. Copyright Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2013

Suggested Citation

  • Phil McEwan & Ray Kim & Yong Yuan, 2013. "Assessing the Cost Utility of Response-Guided Therapy in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C Genotype 1 in the UK Using the MONARCH Model," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 53-63, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:aphecp:v:11:y:2013:i:1:p:53-63
    DOI: 10.1007/s40258-012-0002-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s40258-012-0002-0
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40258-012-0002-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Phil McEwan & Thomas Ward & Hayley Bennett & Anupama Kalsekar & Samantha Webster & Michael Brenner & Yong Yuan, 2015. "Estimating the Clinical and Economic Benefit Associated with Incremental Improvements in Sustained Virologic Response in Chronic Hepatitis C," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(1), pages 1-16, January.
    2. Hayley Bennett & Jason Gordon & Beverley Jones & Thomas Ward & Samantha Webster & Anupama Kalsekar & Yong Yuan & Michael Brenner & Phil McEwan, 2017. "Hepatitis C disease transmission and treatment uptake: impact on the cost-effectiveness of new direct-acting antiviral therapies," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 18(8), pages 1001-1011, November.
    3. Louis Matza & Sandhya Sapra & John Dillon & Anupama Kalsekar & Evan Davies & Mary Devine & Jessica Jordan & Amanda Landrian & David Feeny, 2015. "Health state utilities associated with attributes of treatments for hepatitis C," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 16(9), pages 1005-1018, December.
    4. Umberto Restelli & Alfredo Alberti & Adriano Lazzarin & Marzia Bonfanti & Carmela Nappi & Davide Croce, 2018. "Cost-effectiveness analysis of the use of daclatasvir + sofosbuvir + ribavirin (16 weeks and 12 weeks) vs sofosbuvir + ribavirin (16 weeks and 24 weeks) for the treatment of cirrhotic patients affecte," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 19(1), pages 37-44, January.
    5. Constanza L Vargas & Manuel A Espinoza & Andrés Giglio & Alejandro Soza, 2015. "Cost Effectiveness of Daclatasvir/Asunaprevir Versus Peginterferon/Ribavirin and Protease Inhibitors for the Treatment of Hepatitis c Genotype 1b Naïve Patients in Chile," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(11), pages 1-16, November.
    6. Yun Lu & Xiuze Jin & Cheng-a-xin Duan & Feng Chang, 2018. "Cost-effectiveness of daclatasvir plus asunaprevir for chronic hepatitis C genotype 1b treatment-naïve patients in China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(4), pages 1-12, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:aphecp:v:11:y:2013:i:1:p:53-63. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.