IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/anresc/v32y1998i4p469-494.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

original: Multi-sectoral qualitative analysis: a tool for assessing the competitiveness of regions and formulating strategies for economic development

Author

Listed:
  • Brian Roberts

    (The Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute, Queensland University of Technology, GPO Box 2434, Brisbane, Queensland 4001, Australia)

  • Robert J. Stimson

    (Geographical Sciences and Planning, and The Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute, University of Queensland, St.Lucia, Queensland 4067, Australia)

Abstract

Regional economic development strategy formulation relies heavily on analytical techniques such as shift share, location quotients, input-output and SWOT analysis. However, many of theses traditional tools are proving inadequate for understanding what makes regions competitive. New tools are required to evaluate the competitiveness of regional economies, how to gain competitive advantage, and what new management frameworks and enabling infrastructure are needed to drive economic development processes under globalisation. Multi-sectoral qualitative analysis (MSAQ) is a new tool for regional analysis developed by the authors in a case study of the Far North Queensland region in Australia. MSQA is used to identify the competitiveness of regional core competencies, strategic infrastructure and risk, as well as industry development and market opportunities. The case study provided the basis for the preparation of an economic development strategy to build upon the competitive advantages of the region.

Suggested Citation

  • Brian Roberts & Robert J. Stimson, 1998. "original: Multi-sectoral qualitative analysis: a tool for assessing the competitiveness of regions and formulating strategies for economic development," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 32(4), pages 469-494.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:anresc:v:32:y:1998:i:4:p:469-494
    Note: Received: January 1997 / Accepted: August 1997
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.de/link/service/journals/00168/papers/8032004/80320469.pdf
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Peter Midmore & Max Munday & Annette Roberts, 2006. "Assessing industry linkages using regional input-output tables," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(3), pages 329-343.
    2. Neil Reid & Bruce W. Smith & Michael C. Carroll, 2008. "Cluster Regions," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 22(4), pages 345-352, November.
    3. Jane Bryan & Max Munday & Richard Bevins, 2012. "Developing a Framework for Assessing the Socioeconomic Impacts of Museums," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 49(1), pages 133-151, January.
    4. Michael Carroll & Neil Reid & Bruce Smith, 2008. "Location quotients versus spatial autocorrelation in identifying potential cluster regions," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 42(2), pages 449-463, June.
    5. Jim McFarlane & Bligh Grant & Boyd Blackwell & Stuart Mounter, 2017. "Combining amenity with experience," Tourism Economics, , vol. 23(5), pages 1076-1095, August.
    6. Chávez Juan Carlos & Katia García Loredo, 2015. "Identification of Regional Clusters in Mexican Manufacturing Industry," Working Papers 2015-19, Banco de México.
    7. Jingjing Liu & Jamie M. Chen & Peter Nijkamp & James F. Petrick, 2023. "Threshold effect of tourism density on urban livability: a modeling study on Chinese cities," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 70(1), pages 315-331, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:anresc:v:32:y:1998:i:4:p:469-494. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.