IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v82y1998i0p29-4810.1023-a1018918921334.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The studio approach toteaching the craft of modeling

Author

Listed:
  • Stephen Powell

Abstract

Successful applications of MS/OR depends on striking a balance between the science ofMS/OR (its tools and a body of related technical knowledge) and the craft of MS/OR, which isa much less well-defined collection of practical skills. Many observers note that the teaching ofMS/OR has emphasized the scientific aspects of the field to the near exclusion of the craft aspects.The major focus has been on the tools of MS/OR: linear programs, decision trees, queueingmodels, and so on. But for the practitioner, the tools or models themselves are only part of abroader modeling effort. Successfully teaching the craft of modeling has been a long-termchallenge in MS/OR. In this paper, I describe one successful approach, called the “studioapproach”, to teaching the craft of modeling to practitioners. This approach resembles the wayother arts such as painting or architecture are taught. I explore the analogy between teaching thecraft of modeling by first examining how the arts are taught, and then comparing how modelingis taught in a studio setting. One of many interesting connections between these two domains liesin the development of a specialized language by which the teacher communicates his or her craftto the student. I propose a number of modeling heuristics, or rules of thumb, which begin tocapture some of the language of the practising modeler. Copyright Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998

Suggested Citation

  • Stephen Powell, 1998. "The studio approach toteaching the craft of modeling," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 82(0), pages 29-48, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:82:y:1998:i:0:p:29-48:10.1023/a:1018918921334
    DOI: 10.1023/A:1018918921334
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1023/A:1018918921334
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1023/A:1018918921334?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. S G Powell & T R Willemain, 2007. "How novices formulate models. Part I: qualitative insights and implications for teaching," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 58(8), pages 983-995, August.
    2. T R Willemain & S G Powell, 2007. "How novices formulate models. Part II: a quantitative description of behaviour," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 58(10), pages 1271-1283, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:82:y:1998:i:0:p:29-48:10.1023/a:1018918921334. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.