IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/smo/jornl1/v4y2020i1p79-86.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Towards Introducing a New Concept for Standard Arabic

Author

Listed:
  • Mamon Suleiman ALGHANNAM

    (Higher Colleges of Technology, United Arab Emirates)

Abstract

Arab linguists offer a specific concept of classical Arabic (ALFUSSHA), as they have made determined signs (Aldhima, afatha, alkisra and alsikun) a prerequisite for classical Arabic language for it. This concept has led to a revolution in linguistic and grammatical authorship movement such as linguistic correction which means people must return to the old Arabic, and linguistic renew which sees that the Arabic language needs to renew itself, because of the Persistence and difficulty in its rules. This research paper seeks to present a new concept of the classical Arabic language that goes beyond the description of grammarians. As the concept of classical is limited to the structure not to the words. This paper depends on the descriptive approach in order to reach the goal by standing on models of classical in Arabic: The Holy Qur'an and the levels of the Arabic language now. The results of this study show that the grammar of the Arabic language is not a condition of the Arabic language, and explain that the colloquial in its context may be more understanding than the standard Arabic language, and these results reject accusations to the Arabic language as a language threatened with extinction.

Suggested Citation

  • Mamon Suleiman ALGHANNAM, 2020. "Towards Introducing a New Concept for Standard Arabic," RAIS Journal for Social Sciences, Research Association for Interdisciplinary Studies, vol. 4(1), pages 79-86, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:smo:jornl1:v:4:y:2020:i:1:p:79-86
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://journal.rais.education/index.php/raiss/article/view/92/72
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://journal.rais.education/index.php/raiss/article/view/92
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:smo:jornl1:v:4:y:2020:i:1:p:79-86. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Eduard David (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://journal.rais.education/index.php/raiss .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.