IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sko/yrbook/v13y2016i1p81-99.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Two approaches for analysing and evaluating the short-term effects of fiscal and monetary policy coordination during the crisis

Author

Listed:
  • Dimitar Zlatinov

    (Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Sofia University St Kliment Ohridski)

Abstract

This paper discusses and proposes two analytical approaches for analysing and evaluating the coordination of fiscal and monetary policy conducted during the current crises based on achievement of their fundamental economic goals as well as their efficiency. Using such a framework, the paper aims to make an assessment over the coordinated implementation of anti-crisis measures in the USA, United Kingdom, Japan, Russia and China in 2009 – 2011. The main outcome is that the fiscal-monetary mix in the USA and China has been a well-coordinated one and supports economic growth, whereas the United Kingdom, Russia and China have failed to design and implement effective macroeconomic and financial policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Dimitar Zlatinov, 2016. "Two approaches for analysing and evaluating the short-term effects of fiscal and monetary policy coordination during the crisis," Yearbook of the Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Sofia University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Sofia University St Kliment Ohridski - Bulgaria, vol. 13(1), pages 81-99, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:sko:yrbook:v:13:y:2016:i:1:p:81-99
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.feb.uni-sofia.bg/sko/yrbook/Yearbook13-04.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sonya Georgieva, 2021. "Fiscal Multipliers in Bulgaria and Central and Eastern Europe Countries," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 1, pages 131-167.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sko:yrbook:v:13:y:2016:i:1:p:81-99. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Prof. Teodor Sedlarski (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fesofbg.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.