IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sja/journl/v11y2022i4p532-544.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing the Means of Evidence by Forensic Reports in Criminal Cases of Business

Author

Listed:
  • Delia MAGHERESCU

    (Gorj Bar Association, Romania)

Abstract

The new era of forensic investigation of criminal cases means currently a challenge for the judicial bodies in their duties of finding truth during the criminal proceedings. In achieving this purpose, the role of forensic evidence is as bigger as the forensic reports provide the judges and prosecutors with pertinent, conclusive and genuine data the criminal decisions shall be based on. The current research focuses on assessing the means of evidence by forensic expertise reports in the criminal cases of business, which present a high interest both for the area of forensic science and the decision making process in criminal cases. In this respect, it has been identified three particular criminal cases related to the field of business. They refer to the cases of economic offenses, business-related corruption, and organized crime. The work uses a qualitative research methodology with elements of case-law references in the field of business. The results obtained during the conceptual study have stated that the forensic reports submitted by the forensic experts contribute to solving the criminal cases related to the field of business and making solutions as long as they are corroborated with the other means of evidence administrated in the criminal proceedings. The research conducted has been directed to the idea that, as a general rule, the forensic reports do not have a pre-established judicial value, although they provide scientific evidence, which are also very difficult to be reversed. Considering all these aspects, the conclusions state that assessing forensic reports in criminal cases of business is a complex activity which the judges should pursue in order to pronounce legal and evidence-based decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Delia MAGHERESCU, 2022. "Assessing the Means of Evidence by Forensic Reports in Criminal Cases of Business," Perspectives of Law and Public Administration, Societatea de Stiinte Juridice si Administrative (Society of Juridical and Administrative Sciences), vol. 11(4), pages 532-544, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:sja:journl:v:11:y:2022:i:4:p:532-544
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://adjuris.ro/revista/articole/An11nr4/6.%20Lucrare-2-Magherescu%20Delia%20EN.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sonja Cindori & Tajana Petrovic, 2018. "The Significance of Assessing Money Laundering Risk as a Part of Auditing Operations," Athens Journal of Business & Economics, Athens Institute for Education and Research (ATINER), vol. 4(1), pages 69-82, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. William Gaviyau & Athenia Bongani Sibindi, 2023. "Customer Due Diligence in the FinTech Era: A Bibliometric Analysis," Risks, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-17, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    criminal proceedings; field of business; forensic reports; assessing means of evidence; scientific evidence; criminal cases of business.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K14 - Law and Economics - - Basic Areas of Law - - - Criminal Law
    • K42 - Law and Economics - - Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior - - - Illegal Behavior and the Enforcement of Law

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sja:journl:v:11:y:2022:i:4:p:532-544. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catalin-Silviu Sararu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ssjarea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.