IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sja/journl/v11y2022i2p287-293.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Practical Considerations On The Admissibility Of The Plea Of Illegality In Administrative Litigation

Author

Listed:
  • Anamaria GROZA

    (Faculty of Law, University of Craiova, Judge at the Craiova Court of Appeal, Romania)

Abstract

The plea of illegality allows the control of the legality and validity of individual administrative acts, without any time limit. At least, the literal and grammatical interpretation of article 4 of the Law on Administrative Litigation leads to such a conclusion. Unfortunately, the case law ãhas createdÓ several limitations on the use of this judicial review tool, and most of them do not have a solid legal basis. The protection of the res judicata principle, but also other situations that would circumvent the legal regime of the action for annulment, as well as the broad category of fiscal-administrative acts were considered grounds for the inadmissibility of the plea of illegality, administrative acts outside its scope respectively. What is worse is the fact that the limitations in question may constitute restrictions on the right of access to justice, more precisely to the procedural route of the plea of illegality. The study aims to analyze the legal basis of the cases of inadmissibility of the plea of illegality, created by case law and their compliance with the will of the legislature. The author's goal is to produce a paradigm shift with regard to this legal institution and to increase its degree of effectiveness. The research conducted is descriptive and explanatory, underpinned by relevant case law and doctrine.

Suggested Citation

  • Anamaria GROZA, 2022. "Practical Considerations On The Admissibility Of The Plea Of Illegality In Administrative Litigation," Perspectives of Law and Public Administration, Societatea de Stiinte Juridice si Administrative (Society of Juridical and Administrative Sciences), vol. 11(2), pages 287-293, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:sja:journl:v:11:y:2022:i:2:p:287-293
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://adjuris.ro/revista/articole/An11nr2/9.%20Groza%20Anamaria%20Art.%201.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    plea of illegality; administrative acts; judicial review of administrative acts; inadmissibility; imprescriptibility; res judicata.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K23 - Law and Economics - - Regulation and Business Law - - - Regulated Industries and Administrative Law
    • K41 - Law and Economics - - Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior - - - Litigation Process

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sja:journl:v:11:y:2022:i:2:p:287-293. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catalin-Silviu Sararu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ssjarea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.