IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sja/journl/v10y2021i1p79-88.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Interference Of The Legitimate Public And Private Interest In Exercising The Competences Of The National Office Of Gambling

Author

Listed:
  • Daniela Hudelcu

    (Doctoral School of the Faculty of Law, University of Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

I have chosen to address this issue, in the context of a regulation that is making its presence felt more and more, how much the pandemic situation has directed gambling players to the online environment. This study wishes to emphasize the importance of public authorities for monitoring and supervising gambling sites which are not licensed and authorized in Romania, as well as the identification of some mechanisms and instruments for pursuing some benefits from the determined circumstances of carrying out the activity of remote gambling in the absence of legal documents. In this paper, we propose a brief approach from a legal perspective on regarding the legitimate public and private interest, with the consequence that the restriction online gambling sites and do not hold the license of gambling organizer and authorization to operate the informatics platforms in Romania, occasion on which we will evaluate the effects of the restrictions of the sites produced until the present. However, we will try to show the intention of the legislator regarding the measure and the criteria of restriction within the regulated legal norm.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniela Hudelcu, 2021. "Interference Of The Legitimate Public And Private Interest In Exercising The Competences Of The National Office Of Gambling," Perspectives of Law and Public Administration, Societatea de Stiinte Juridice si Administrative (Society of Juridical and Administrative Sciences), vol. 10(1), pages 79-88, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:sja:journl:v:10:y:2021:i:1:p:79-88
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.adjuris.ro/revista/articole/an10nr1/8.%20Dana%20Hudelcu.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    blacklist; gambling; gambling sites; legitimate private interest; legitimate public interest; National Office of Gambling; restriction.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K23 - Law and Economics - - Regulation and Business Law - - - Regulated Industries and Administrative Law

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sja:journl:v:10:y:2021:i:1:p:79-88. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catalin-Silviu Sararu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ssjarea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.