IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sgv/gjsg01/v3i1p64-74.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A MODIFIED VERSION OF SIX SIGMA DMAIC TO ADDRESS OBSTACLES WITHIN THE GCC COUNTRIES: a Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Pr Shadi ABOUZEID

    (School of Business Administration, American University in Dubai)

  • Pr Susan ZEIDAN

    (School of Business Administration, American University in Dubai)

Abstract

Since its inception, Six Sigma has been helping organizations in improving their bottom line by decreasing costs through minimizing variations. Though its implementation is widespread in North America and Western Europe, it still has a modest presence in GCC (Gulf Cooperation Council) countries. The increased competition in today’s markets and the GCC countries’ long term plans of sustainability are putting pressure on organizations to adopt different process improvement strategies, such as, Six Sigma. In this article, we will introduce Six Sigma, its benefits and its methodology DMAIC. We will then introduce I.M.A.G.E.S, which is a modified version of the DMAIC methodology designed specifically for projects conducted within the GCC countries. Finally, we will demonstrate the benefits attained by the use of the I.M.A.G.E.S methodology by discussing its application through a Meat and Poultry Factory case study.

Suggested Citation

  • Pr Shadi ABOUZEID & Pr Susan ZEIDAN, . "A MODIFIED VERSION OF SIX SIGMA DMAIC TO ADDRESS OBSTACLES WITHIN THE GCC COUNTRIES: a Case Study," Global Journal of Strategies, Governance & Applied Economics, Global Journal of Strategies, Governance & Applied Economics, vol. 3(1), pages 64-74.
    • Handle: RePEc:sgv:gjsg01:v:3:i:1:p:64-74
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://publications.review-gjsg.com/Vol3no1/article04.php
    Download Restriction: One must be logged in to read the articles purchased. Everytime prompted to enter information, you may enter the same username and password.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sgv:gjsg01:v:3:i:1:p:64-74. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.review-gjsg.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.