IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sgv/gjsg01/v2i2p66-81.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact Of Performance Appraisal Systems On Employee Productivity

Author

Listed:
  • Pr Zehra Roofi BUDHWANI

    (Bahria University Karachi Campus, Pakistan)

  • Dr. Amanat Ali JALBANI

    (SZABIST, Pakistan)

Abstract

Performance Management system is now widely recognized as a significant vehicle for improving performance and productivity of both employees and organizations. Therefore many organizations are reexamining their current performance management systems. This research evaluates the efficacy of current performance appraisal systems and then identifies the significance and implications of the introduction of 360 degree feedback as a form of appraisal and its impact on the productivity of employees in Pakistan’s Banking Sector. For this purpose, qualitative research was conducted through questionnaires. The findings of the survey revealed that ranking method and management by objectives are the two most commonly used appraisal systems in the industry, but a strong preference has been observed for implementation of the 360 degree feedback system. However, most of the respondents felt that 360 degree feedback will lead to no or very small increase in productivity.

Suggested Citation

  • Pr Zehra Roofi BUDHWANI & Dr. Amanat Ali JALBANI, . "Impact Of Performance Appraisal Systems On Employee Productivity," Global Journal of Strategies, Governance & Applied Economics, Global Journal of Strategies, Governance & Applied Economics, vol. 2(2), pages 66-81.
    • Handle: RePEc:sgv:gjsg01:v:2:i:2:p:66-81
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://publications.review-gjsg.com/Vol2no2/article04.php
    Download Restriction: One must be logged in to read the articles purchased. Everytime prompted to enter information, you may enter the same username and password.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sgv:gjsg01:v:2:i:2:p:66-81. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.review-gjsg.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.