IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sgm/pzwzuw/v15i65y2017p237-253.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating the Impact of Regulation and Regulatory Policy – Towards Better Entrepreneurial Ecosystem. The Case of Poland

Author

Listed:
  • Paulina Kubera

    (Poznañ University of Technology, Faculty of Management Engineering, Chair of Entrepreneurship and Business Communication)

Abstract

The relationship between regulatory framework and entrepreneurial activity can be of a three-fold nature: law can foster entrepreneurship, hinder entrepreneurship or be neutral in this respect. One of the tools to underpin the capacity of public policy makers to ensure that regulation achieves its objective is the regulatory impact assessment (RIA). OECD defines RIA as ‘a systemic approach to critically assessing the positive and negative effects of proposed and existing regulations and non-regulatory alternatives’. The objective of this paper is to examine the potential contribution of the regulatory impact analysis to building a more effective entrepreneurial ecosystem by reducing so-called ‘government failure’, in particular in Polish circumstances. The concern is not for specific legal provisions but the policy-making process, in which RIA is integrated. For this purpose, it reviews the RIA policies and practice in Poland and other OECD countries as well as in the EU. The methods used entail a qualitative document analysis on policy documents, in particular: legislative acts, guidelines and working papers issued by national, OECD and EU authorities, as well as reports and statistics in this field, in particular: the OECD Indicators of Regulatory Policy and Governance (iREG) to make cross-country comparisons and identify challenges in the effective implementation of RIA.

Suggested Citation

  • Paulina Kubera, 2017. "Evaluating the Impact of Regulation and Regulatory Policy – Towards Better Entrepreneurial Ecosystem. The Case of Poland," Problemy Zarzadzania, University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management, vol. 15(65), pages 226-236.
  • Handle: RePEc:sgm:pzwzuw:v:15:i:65:y:2017:p:237-253
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://pz.wz.uw.edu.pl/sites/default/files/artykuly/pz_2017_1_1_kozina.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://pz.wz.uw.edu.pl/en
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    regulatory impact assessment; regulatory policy; government failure; entrepreneurship within small and medium-sized companies; negotiation competences.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H11 - Public Economics - - Structure and Scope of Government - - - Structure and Scope of Government
    • I38 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty - - - Government Programs; Provision and Effects of Welfare Programs
    • K20 - Law and Economics - - Regulation and Business Law - - - General
    • L51 - Industrial Organization - - Regulation and Industrial Policy - - - Economics of Regulation
    • L53 - Industrial Organization - - Regulation and Industrial Policy - - - Enterprise Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sgm:pzwzuw:v:15:i:65:y:2017:p:237-253. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/somuwpl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.