IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sgh/annals/i51y2018p37-62.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Valuation and optimization of contracts on the secondary insurance market

Author

Listed:
  • Joanna Dębicka

    (Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny we Wrocławiu, Wydział Zarządzania, Informatyki i Finansów, Katedra Statystyki)

  • Stanisław Heilpern

    (Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny we Wrocławiu, Wydział Zarządzania, Informatyki i Finansów, Katedra Statystyki)

Abstract

For an insured person who needs money because of suffering from a terminal illness that requires costly diagnosis and treatment, the easiest way of receiving money from life insurance is to withdraw from the contract of insurance. Then the insurer is obliged to pay the surrender value of policy. It appears that there is another possibility for the insured to receive prior financial gratification from life insurance. The insured can sell his policy on the secondary market of life insurance (the viatical market). In such a situation he obtains an amount that is greater than the surrender value (and less than the death benefit). Then the viatical company takes a fee for the insurance premiums, and in case of death of the insured gets the death benefits. Such agreements to resell the rights to death benefits are offered to people who have become terminally ill (viatical settlement). The aim of the paper is twofold. Firstly, we study the influence of the moment of falling ill (compared to the age and sex of the insured and duration of insurance) on the viatical settlemen payments and expected profit of the viatical company. For this purpose, we apply the methodology used by insurance companies in the valuation of the contract. Secondly, we analyse the problem of optimizing the viatical settlement from the point of view of the insured. It will consist in determining the amount of the nominal value of the benefit (the whole or a part) which the insured intends to sell in such a way that the amount of benefits (derived from a viatical settlement and the insurance contract) and premiums maximize the average amount of funds available to the insured. We use various approaches of the insured to risk find an optimal solution, which also allows to take different kinds of human behaviour in risky conditions into consideration. All numerical examples were made on the assumption that the insured person has the endowment insurance and he would like to resale rights to the benefit because he fell ill with lung cancer.

Suggested Citation

  • Joanna Dębicka & Stanisław Heilpern, 2018. "Valuation and optimization of contracts on the secondary insurance market," Collegium of Economic Analysis Annals, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of Economic Analysis, issue 51, pages 37-62.
    • Handle: RePEc:sgh:annals:i:51:y:2018:p:37-62
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://rocznikikae.sgh.waw.pl/p/roczniki_kae_z51_02.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Heilpern, S., 2003. "A rank-dependent generalization of zero utility principle," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 67-73, August.
    2. Kaluszka, Marek & Krzeszowiec, Michał, 2012. "Pricing insurance contracts under Cumulative Prospect Theory," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(1), pages 159-166.
    3. Bradly J. Condon & Tapen Sinha, 2008. "Global Lessons from the AIDS Pandemic," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-3-540-78392-3, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marek Kałuszka & Michał Krzeszowiec, 2013. "Iteracyjność składek ubezpieczeniowych w ujęciu teorii skumulowanej perspektywy i teorii nieokreśloności," Collegium of Economic Analysis Annals, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of Economic Analysis, issue 31, pages 45-56.
    2. Kaluszka, Marek & Krzeszowiec, Michał, 2013. "On iterative premium calculation principles under Cumulative Prospect Theory," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(3), pages 435-440.
    3. Chudziak, J., 2018. "On existence and uniqueness of the principle of equivalent utility under Cumulative Prospect Theory," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 243-246.
    4. Martina Nardon & Paolo Pianca, 2019. "Behavioral premium principles," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 42(1), pages 229-257, June.
    5. Chudziak, J., 2020. "On positive homogeneity and comonotonic additivity of the principle of equivalent utility under Cumulative Prospect Theory," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 154-159.
    6. Martina Nardon & Paolo Pianca, 2019. "Insurance premium calculation under continuous cumulative prospect theory," Working Papers 2019:03, Department of Economics, University of Venice "Ca' Foscari".
    7. Sainan Zhang & Huifu Xu, 2022. "Insurance premium-based shortfall risk measure induced by cumulative prospect theory," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 703-738, October.
    8. Choo, Weihao & de Jong, Piet, 2015. "The tradeoff insurance premium as a two-sided generalisation of the distortion premium," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 238-246.
    9. Furman, Edward & Zitikis, Ricardas, 2008. "Weighted risk capital allocations," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(2), pages 263-269, October.
    10. Furman, Edward & Zitikis, Ricardas, 2008. "Weighted premium calculation principles," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 459-465, February.
    11. Kaluszka, M. & Laeven, R.J.A. & Okolewski, A., 2012. "A note on weighted premium calculation principles," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(2), pages 379-381.
    12. Mao, Tiantian & Stupfler, Gilles & Yang, Fan, 2023. "Asymptotic properties of generalized shortfall risk measures for heavy-tailed risks," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 173-192.
    13. Christian Biener & Martin Eling, 2013. "Recent Research Developments Affecting Nonlife Insurance—The CAS Risk Premium Project 2012 Update," Risk Management and Insurance Review, American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 16(2), pages 219-231, September.
    14. Belles-Sampera, Jaume & Merigó, José M. & Guillén, Montserrat & Santolino, Miguel, 2013. "The connection between distortion risk measures and ordered weighted averaging operators," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(2), pages 411-420.
    15. Joanna Dębicka & Stanisław Heilpern, 2020. "The optimization of insurance contracts on the viatical market," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 30(2), pages 5-27.
    16. Goovaerts, Marc J. & Kaas, Rob & Laeven, Roger J.A., 2010. "A note on additive risk measures in rank-dependent utility," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 47(2), pages 187-189, October.
    17. Tiantian Mao & Jun Cai, 2018. "Risk measures based on behavioural economics theory," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 367-393, April.
    18. Zhuang, Sheng Chao & Weng, Chengguo & Tan, Ken Seng & Assa, Hirbod, 2016. "Marginal Indemnification Function formulation for optimal reinsurance," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 65-76.
    19. Denuit Michel & Dhaene Jan & Goovaerts Marc & Kaas Rob & Laeven Roger, 2006. "Risk measurement with equivalent utility principles," Statistics & Risk Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 24(1), pages 1-25, July.
    20. Cheung, Ka Chun & Yam, Sheung Chi Phillip & Zhang, Yiying, 2019. "Risk-adjusted Bowley reinsurance under distorted probabilities," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 64-72.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sgh:annals:i:51:y:2018:p:37-62. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Michał Bernardelli (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sgwawpl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.