IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ses/arsjes/1997-iii-15.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estimating the Benefits of a Common European Fiscal Policy

Author

Listed:
  • Nannette Hechler-Fayd'Herbe

Abstract

The prospect of the European monetary union moving ahead on schedule has recently revived the discussion on stabilisation policies. The starting point of this discussion has been the observation that, because of relatively low labour mobility and the presence of country-specific shocks, monetary policy at the EC-level might not have the capacity to satisfy national stabilisation objectives. If it leaves economies more exposed to aggregate shocks, the loss of national monetary stabilisation instruments may prove costly and require the Community to insure against regional shocks by use of the other instrument at her disposal: fiscal policy. This paper addresses two main issues. First, it investigates the extent to which macroeconomic stabilisation is desirable from the point of view of the consumer in the European Community, by estimating the perceived costs of consumption instability. Second, being aware that consumption shocks can probably not be entirely eliminated and the individual countries' consumption risk could at best be diversified through an EC-level insurance mechanism, we focus explicitly on the benefits of such a stabilisation policy. Our estimations are based on three alternative models for consumption: a trend stationary, a random walk and an autoregressive model. The results show that traditional stabilisation policies associated with temporary shocks may not generate significant benefits.

Suggested Citation

  • Nannette Hechler-Fayd'Herbe, 1997. "Estimating the Benefits of a Common European Fiscal Policy," Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics (SJES), Swiss Society of Economics and Statistics (SSES), vol. 133(III), pages 575-596, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:ses:arsjes:1997-iii-15
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sjes.ch/papers/1997-III-15.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ses:arsjes:1997-iii-15. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kurt Schmidheiny (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sgvssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.