IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sen/rebelj/v57y2012i2p212-241.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The EU Climate Policy Perspectives and Their Implications for Belgium

Author

Listed:
  • W. Nijs
  • D. Van Regemorter

Abstract

This paper estimates the impact on Belgium of the EU climate policy. This policy intends to reduce the emissions of EU greenhouse gases (GHG) by 80% in 2050 compared to 1990 emissions. The EU target was distributed over member countries in a cost effective way with the European TIMES model and this resulted for Belgium, in a 59% reduction goal for CO2. One reference scenario and four scenarios with different assumptions for nuclear and carbon capture and storage were taken into account for the Belgian TIMES model. For this CO2 emission reduction objective, the crucial changes are a decrease in the growth of the demand for energy services (e.g. tonnes of steel, km driven) and a strong increase in the level of investments in low carbon technologies. A shift towards more energy efficient technologies is important in all scenarios. Carbon capture and storage (CCS) is the most important contributor to the emission target when CCS is allowed and nuclear is shut down. The annual welfare cost for the period 2005–2050 varies from 1.5 B€ 2005 per year when nuclear and CCS are available to 4.1 B€ 2005 per year when none of these options are available. However, the participation in a global EU CO2 market is essential for Belgium. Without the possibility of trade, the welfare loss increases with an additional 1.0 B€ 2005 per year when CCS is allowed and nuclear is shut down. The increase of the cost for energy services is about four times larger than the welfare loss. The reason is that the reduction in the demand for energy services requires strong increases in the energy prices for consumers.

Suggested Citation

  • W. Nijs & D. Van Regemorter, 2012. "The EU Climate Policy Perspectives and Their Implications for Belgium," Review of Business and Economic Literature, Intersentia, vol. 57(2), pages 212-241, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:sen:rebelj:v:57:y:2012:i:2:p:212-241
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sen:rebelj:v:57:y:2012:i:2:p:212-241. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Petra Van den Bempt (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.rebel-journal.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.