IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sen/journl/v10i1y2009p17-45.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Third European Energy Liberalization Package: Does Functional and Legal Unbundling in the Gas Storage Sector Go too Far?

Author

Listed:
  • A. Ming-zhi Gao

Abstract

The third European gas liberalization package (the 3rd Package) is intended to facilitate access to gas storage through the introduction of functional and legal unbundling in the storage sector. This article will challenge this new regulatory regime from two perspectives. First, this new regime may change the originally coherent regulatory patterns in the 1st and 2nd Gas Directives without taking into account the economic rationales. Second, this new regime will lead to three serious concerns upon implementation, i.e., the cost-effectiveness, clear implementation of the unbundling, and the doctrine of 'rigid unbundling as a last resort. For the purpose of finding a solution, this article provides three legislative suggestions to the 3rd Package. In spite of these efforts, the issue of the unclear scope of storage subject to the open access regime and to the functional and legal unbundling remains unresolved in the 2nd Gas Directive and 3rd Package. Thus, to facilitate access to storage, it is suggested that the Commission may have to clarify the scope issue first and consider adopting a more direct approach; i.e., it should consider the regulated third party access regime for the storage sector in the 3rd Package instead of the indirect approach of further unbundling.

Suggested Citation

  • A. Ming-zhi Gao, 2009. "The Third European Energy Liberalization Package: Does Functional and Legal Unbundling in the Gas Storage Sector Go too Far?," Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, Intersentia, vol. 10(1), pages 17-45, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:sen:journl:v:10:i:1:y:2009:p:17-45
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sen:journl:v:10:i:1:y:2009:p:17-45. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Petra Van den Bempt (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.crninet.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.