IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/seh/journl/y2008i44maprilp21-51.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

La política ilustrada y el libre comercio de granos: las ‘Reflexiones económico-políticas’ (1768) de Tomás Anzano

Author

Listed:
  • Javier Usoz

    (Universidad de Zaragoza)

Abstract

This article analyses Reflexiones económico-políticas (1768) by the economist Tomás Anzano, whose contribution has almost been ignored historiographycalIy. An important work in the Spanish literature of the 18th century, Reflexiones must be contextualized within the debate on the agrarian markets liberalization and, in particular, subsistence goods developed by the European Enlightenment. Reflexiones constitutes an original and pragmatic but at the same time a moderate adaptation to the real interior market of the liberal legislation of 1765. Anzano's proposals on agriculture, based in the scholastic theory of prices, should take into account the contemporary political background: the Enlightened economic reform, the growing weight of the royal prerogatives in the political institutions, and the beginning of the economic demands of the territories that made up the Borbonic monarchy. AH together links Anzano to the structure of political power, because he was a part of it and also due to the fact that he stablished closed relationships with two of the main Aragonese politicians at that time: Manuel de Roda and the Count of Aranda.

Suggested Citation

  • Javier Usoz, 2008. "La política ilustrada y el libre comercio de granos: las ‘Reflexiones económico-políticas’ (1768) de Tomás Anzano," Historia Agraria. Revista de Agricultura e Historia Rural, Sociedad Española de Historia Agraria, issue 44, pages 21-51, april.
  • Handle: RePEc:seh:journl:y:2008:i:44:m:april:p:21-51
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://repositori.uji.es/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10234/161817/2008%2c%2044%2c%2021-51.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Tomás Anzano; agrarian thought; commerce of grains;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • A12 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - Relation of Economics to Other Disciplines
    • B11 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought through 1925 - - - Preclassical (Ancient, Medieval, Mercantilist, Physiocratic)
    • N54 - Economic History - - Agriculture, Natural Resources, Environment and Extractive Industries - - - Europe: 1913-

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:seh:journl:y:2008:i:44:m:april:p:21-51. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Vicente Pinilla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sehiaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.